Taxation of the Income Arising From the Right to Claim Obtained From Pre-paid Housing Sales in the Scope of Income Tax Code

Aylin Armağan, Ali Çelikel
{"title":"Taxation of the Income Arising From the Right to Claim Obtained From Pre-paid Housing Sales in the Scope of Income Tax Code","authors":"Aylin Armağan, Ali Çelikel","doi":"10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pre-paid housing sales contract is a consumer contract between the consumer and the seller. This contract is mostly made in the form of preliminary property sales contract. Right to claim between the parties will be arised with this contract. Therefore, it is also possible for the consumer to transfer this right. It is controversial whether the income obtained from the transfer of this right will be taxed under the Income Tax Law. There are three main views on this issue, which were discussed in the doctrine before. According to the first, this gain is a capital gain. Secondly, this gain is an occasional commercial gain. According to the last opinion, this gain cannot be evaluated under the Income Tax Law and therefore cannot be taxed. Within the scope of this study, these views in the doctrine were examined. One of the results achived in this subject is that the terms are not in line with the terminology of civil law. In fact, the concept of “the right to buy housing” should be corrected as the right to claim. Also it is concluded that the income obtained from the transfer of the claim will not be considered as an capital gain within the scope of of the Income Tax Code. The expansion of the article of the law to include this gain, is primarily against the principle of the legality of the tax which sourced from the Constitution. Finally, it is stated that this gain cannot be described as occasional commercial gain if it is obtained from the preliminary property sales contract which is risen from the pre-paid housing sales. Since only the consumer can be a party of a pre-paid housing sale, this prevents all transactions from being considered as commercial.","PeriodicalId":313557,"journal":{"name":"34. International Public Finance Conference","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34. International Public Finance Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-paid housing sales contract is a consumer contract between the consumer and the seller. This contract is mostly made in the form of preliminary property sales contract. Right to claim between the parties will be arised with this contract. Therefore, it is also possible for the consumer to transfer this right. It is controversial whether the income obtained from the transfer of this right will be taxed under the Income Tax Law. There are three main views on this issue, which were discussed in the doctrine before. According to the first, this gain is a capital gain. Secondly, this gain is an occasional commercial gain. According to the last opinion, this gain cannot be evaluated under the Income Tax Law and therefore cannot be taxed. Within the scope of this study, these views in the doctrine were examined. One of the results achived in this subject is that the terms are not in line with the terminology of civil law. In fact, the concept of “the right to buy housing” should be corrected as the right to claim. Also it is concluded that the income obtained from the transfer of the claim will not be considered as an capital gain within the scope of of the Income Tax Code. The expansion of the article of the law to include this gain, is primarily against the principle of the legality of the tax which sourced from the Constitution. Finally, it is stated that this gain cannot be described as occasional commercial gain if it is obtained from the preliminary property sales contract which is risen from the pre-paid housing sales. Since only the consumer can be a party of a pre-paid housing sale, this prevents all transactions from being considered as commercial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《所得税法》范围内预售住房取得的债权所得的征税问题
房屋预售合同是消费者与卖方之间的一种消费合同。本合同主要采取初步财产买卖合同的形式。双方之间的请求权将随着本合同的签订而产生。因此,消费者也可以转让这一权利。对于转让该权利所取得的所得是否应按所得税法征税,存在争议。关于这个问题有三种主要的观点,在前面的学说中已经讨论过了。根据第一种说法,这种收益是资本收益。其次,这种收益是偶然的商业收益。根据最后一种意见,这种收益不能根据所得税法进行评估,因此不能征税。在本研究的范围内,对学说中的这些观点进行了审查。本课题研究的结果之一是这些术语与民法术语不一致。事实上,“购房权”的概念应该更正为请求权。此外,得出的结论是,从转让索赔中获得的收入将不被视为《所得税法》范围内的资本收益。扩大法律条款以包括这一收益,主要是违反了源于宪法的税收合法性原则。最后,本文指出,如果这种收益来自于预付费住房销售产生的初步房地产销售合同,则不能被描述为偶然的商业收益。由于只有消费者可以成为预付住房销售的一方,这就防止了所有交易都被视为商业交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regional Inequalities in European Union and Potential Impacts of European Union Membership Process on Regional Disparities in Turkey An Evaluation on Social State Understanding and Turkey An Analysis on the Relationship Between Fuel Taxes and Fuel Consumption and Current Deficit: a Case of Turkey Characteristics of Plastic Bag Fee and the Evaluation of This Fee by Means of Fiscal and Environmental Policy Financial Analysis of the Political Property of Ni̇zâmül Mülk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1