Knowledge, attitude and practice of health care providers toward prescribing factor replacement at federally funded haemophilia treatment centres in the United States

M. Bloomberg, K. Sargenton, K. Gattamorta, D. Anglade
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude and practice of health care providers toward prescribing factor replacement at federally funded haemophilia treatment centres in the United States","authors":"M. Bloomberg, K. Sargenton, K. Gattamorta, D. Anglade","doi":"10.17225/jhp00165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Factor replacement is currently the standard of care to prevent or treat bleeding episodes in haemophilia patients. This study examined current prescribing practices of factor therapy for patients at haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) in the United States. Aims The aims were to evaluate the driving forces for prescribing factor products, to evaluate current attitudes and knowledge toward factor product and industry, and to discuss the implications for health care providers in practice. Methods An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to 744 HTC health care providers (HCPs); 118 responses were analysed. Results The most common driving force for HCPs to change a patient's factor product was poor response to current therapy, while the most common perception of patients’ motivation to switch products was the potential for fewer infusions. HCPs with strong influence over the prescribed therapy identified inadequate pharmacokinetic (PK) studies as an important driving force; patients/caregivers perceived as having a strong influence over which therapy is prescribed selected less frequent dosing as an important motivator. HCPs who allow patients/caregivers to have a strong influence over which factor is prescribed were more likely to cite patient/caregiver request as a significant driving force for change in therapy. Conclusion The haemophilia treatment landscape continues to evolve and is becoming increasingly complex. The multitude of treatment options available now offer choices, presenting a need to focus on patient-centric prophylaxis.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17225/jhp00165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Factor replacement is currently the standard of care to prevent or treat bleeding episodes in haemophilia patients. This study examined current prescribing practices of factor therapy for patients at haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) in the United States. Aims The aims were to evaluate the driving forces for prescribing factor products, to evaluate current attitudes and knowledge toward factor product and industry, and to discuss the implications for health care providers in practice. Methods An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to 744 HTC health care providers (HCPs); 118 responses were analysed. Results The most common driving force for HCPs to change a patient's factor product was poor response to current therapy, while the most common perception of patients’ motivation to switch products was the potential for fewer infusions. HCPs with strong influence over the prescribed therapy identified inadequate pharmacokinetic (PK) studies as an important driving force; patients/caregivers perceived as having a strong influence over which therapy is prescribed selected less frequent dosing as an important motivator. HCPs who allow patients/caregivers to have a strong influence over which factor is prescribed were more likely to cite patient/caregiver request as a significant driving force for change in therapy. Conclusion The haemophilia treatment landscape continues to evolve and is becoming increasingly complex. The multitude of treatment options available now offer choices, presenting a need to focus on patient-centric prophylaxis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国联邦资助血友病治疗中心卫生保健提供者对处方因子替代的知识、态度和实践
因子替代是目前预防或治疗血友病患者出血发作的标准护理。本研究调查了目前美国血友病治疗中心(HTCs)患者因子治疗的处方实践。目的评估因子产品处方的驱动力,评估当前对因子产品和行业的态度和知识,并讨论对卫生保健提供者在实践中的影响。方法对744名HTC医护人员(HCPs)进行匿名电子调查;对118份回复进行了分析。结果HCPs改变患者因子产品最常见的驱动力是对当前治疗的不良反应,而患者最常见的动机是减少输液的可能性。对处方治疗有强烈影响的HCPs认为药代动力学(PK)研究不足是一个重要的驱动因素;患者/护理人员被认为对哪种治疗处方有很大影响,选择频率较低的剂量是一个重要的激励因素。允许患者/护理人员对处方因素有强大影响力的HCPs更有可能将患者/护理人员的要求作为改变治疗的重要驱动力。结论血友病治疗形势不断发展,并变得越来越复杂。目前可获得的多种治疗方案提供了多种选择,因此需要注重以患者为中心的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living, Caring, Learning – The treatment centre as family for a woman with severe haemophilia Living, Caring, Learning – Reflections on the therapeutic relationship in haemophilia care Future Care Pathways – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Future Care Pathways The impact of the Contaminated Blood Scandal on the next generation: the state of the evidence Editorial – Living, Caring, Learning: How patients shape the specialist haemophilia nurse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1