Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Answering Questions on the Chemistry National Standardized School Exam in Kupang

F. Asbupel, H. Retnawati, Muhardis, Seriana Yovita, S. Munadi
{"title":"Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Answering Questions on the Chemistry National Standardized School Exam in Kupang","authors":"F. Asbupel, H. Retnawati, Muhardis, Seriana Yovita, S. Munadi","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210305.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics item questions of chemistry national standardized school exam and identify students’ difficulties in answering questions. Data collection was carried out by documenting results of the exam in 2018 in Kupang city. The documentation was consisted of 35 multiple choice questions, keys answer and test results of 103 samples students. This research was a descriptive exploratory study. Data analysis was carried out quantitatively and qualitatively. Quantitative data analysis was performed using the classical test theory approach and item response theory with 1 logistical parameter. Qualitative data analysis was carried out to describe the items that were included in the category of difficult levels of distress and poor differentiation, by means of focus group discussion (FGD). The results showed that there were 8 difficult items out of 35 student test items. Base on the results of FGD, the students' difficulties in answering questions were caused by a lack of conceptual understanding in calculating and using complex formulas. The results of the estimated reliability of the questions amounted to 0.83 which showed that chemistry national standardized school exam questions were in the good reliability category.","PeriodicalId":378773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210305.032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics item questions of chemistry national standardized school exam and identify students’ difficulties in answering questions. Data collection was carried out by documenting results of the exam in 2018 in Kupang city. The documentation was consisted of 35 multiple choice questions, keys answer and test results of 103 samples students. This research was a descriptive exploratory study. Data analysis was carried out quantitatively and qualitatively. Quantitative data analysis was performed using the classical test theory approach and item response theory with 1 logistical parameter. Qualitative data analysis was carried out to describe the items that were included in the category of difficult levels of distress and poor differentiation, by means of focus group discussion (FGD). The results showed that there were 8 difficult items out of 35 student test items. Base on the results of FGD, the students' difficulties in answering questions were caused by a lack of conceptual understanding in calculating and using complex formulas. The results of the estimated reliability of the questions amounted to 0.83 which showed that chemistry national standardized school exam questions were in the good reliability category.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姑邦县全国标准化学校化学考试学生答题困难分析
本研究的目的是描述化学国家标准化学校考试的特征题,并找出学生在回答问题时的困难。数据收集是通过记录2018年古邦市的考试结果来进行的。该文件由103名样本学生的35个选择题、关键答案和测试结果组成。本研究为描述性探索性研究。对数据进行定量和定性分析。定量数据分析采用经典测试理论方法和1个逻辑参数的项目反应理论。通过焦点小组讨论(FGD),进行了定性数据分析,以描述包含在困难痛苦水平和差区分类别中的项目。结果显示,在35个学生测试项目中,有8个是难题。根据FGD的结果,学生回答问题的困难是由于在计算和使用复杂公式时缺乏概念理解造成的。题目的信度估计结果为0.83,表明化学国家标准化学校考试题目的信度处于较好的范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microtremors Measurement Around Dengkeng Fault Line in Central Java The Role of Collaborative Learning Based STSE in Acid Base Chemistry: Effects on Students’ Motivation The Effect of Leaf-Waste Type and Bioconversion Ability Based on Feed Conversion Ratio in Black Soldiers Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens, L.) Development of Inquiry-Based Multimedia Learning Module with PhET Simulation in Newton’s Law of Motion The Effect of Introduction, Connection, Application, Reflection, and Extension (ICARE) towards Students’ Chemistry Learning Outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1