A survey of storm-induced seaward-transport features observed during the 2019 and 2020 hurricane seasons

Shore & Beach Pub Date : 2021-06-09 DOI:10.34237/1008924
Jin‐Si R. Over, Jenna A. Brown, C. Sherwood, C. Hegermiller, P. Wernette, A. Ritchie, J. Warrick
{"title":"A survey of storm-induced seaward-transport features observed during the 2019 and 2020 hurricane seasons","authors":"Jin‐Si R. Over, Jenna A. Brown, C. Sherwood, C. Hegermiller, P. Wernette, A. Ritchie, J. Warrick","doi":"10.34237/1008924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hurricanes are known to play a critical role in reshaping coastlines, but often only impacts on the open ocean coast are considered, ignoring seaward-directed forces and responses. The identification of subaerial evidence for storm-induced seaward transport is a critical step towards understanding its impact on coastal resiliency. The visual features, found in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Geodetic Survey Emergency Response Imagery (ERI) collected after recent hurricanes on the U.S. East Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts, include scours and channelized erosion, but also deposition on the shoreface or in the nearshore as deltas and fans of various sizes. We catalog all available ERI and describe recently formed features found on the North Core Banks, North Carolina, after Hurricane Dorian (2019); the Carolina coasts after Hurricane Isaias (2020); the Isles Dernieres, Louisiana, after Hurricane Zeta (2020); and the southwest coast of Louisiana, after Hurricanes Laura and Delta (2020). Hundreds of features were identified over nearly 200 km of coastline with the density of features exceeding 20 per km in some areas. Individual features range in size from 5 m to 500 m in the alongshore, with similar dimensions in the cross-shore direction, including the formation or reactivation of outlets. The extensive occurrence of these storm-induced return-flow and seawardflow morphologic features demonstrates that their role in coastal evolution and resilience may be more prominent than previously thought. Based on these observations we propose clarifying terms for return- and seaward-flow features to distinguish them from more frequently documented landward-flow features and advocate for their inclusion in coastal change hazards classification schemes and coastal evolution morphodynamic models.","PeriodicalId":153020,"journal":{"name":"Shore & Beach","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shore & Beach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34237/1008924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Hurricanes are known to play a critical role in reshaping coastlines, but often only impacts on the open ocean coast are considered, ignoring seaward-directed forces and responses. The identification of subaerial evidence for storm-induced seaward transport is a critical step towards understanding its impact on coastal resiliency. The visual features, found in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Geodetic Survey Emergency Response Imagery (ERI) collected after recent hurricanes on the U.S. East Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts, include scours and channelized erosion, but also deposition on the shoreface or in the nearshore as deltas and fans of various sizes. We catalog all available ERI and describe recently formed features found on the North Core Banks, North Carolina, after Hurricane Dorian (2019); the Carolina coasts after Hurricane Isaias (2020); the Isles Dernieres, Louisiana, after Hurricane Zeta (2020); and the southwest coast of Louisiana, after Hurricanes Laura and Delta (2020). Hundreds of features were identified over nearly 200 km of coastline with the density of features exceeding 20 per km in some areas. Individual features range in size from 5 m to 500 m in the alongshore, with similar dimensions in the cross-shore direction, including the formation or reactivation of outlets. The extensive occurrence of these storm-induced return-flow and seawardflow morphologic features demonstrates that their role in coastal evolution and resilience may be more prominent than previously thought. Based on these observations we propose clarifying terms for return- and seaward-flow features to distinguish them from more frequently documented landward-flow features and advocate for their inclusion in coastal change hazards classification schemes and coastal evolution morphodynamic models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对2019年和2020年飓风季节观测到的风暴诱发的海上运输特征的调查
众所周知,飓风在重塑海岸线方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但通常只考虑对开阔海岸的影响,而忽略了朝向大海的力量和反应。确定风暴引起的海上运输的陆上证据是了解其对沿海弹性影响的关键一步。美国国家海洋和大气管理局、国家大地测量紧急响应图像(ERI)在最近的飓风袭击美国东大西洋和墨西哥湾海岸后收集了这些视觉特征,包括冲刷和水道侵蚀,但也包括在海岸或近岸沉积的各种大小的三角洲和扇。我们对所有可用的ERI进行了编目,并描述了在飓风多里安(2019)之后在北卡罗来纳州北核心银行发现的最近形成的特征;飓风伊萨亚斯(2020)后的卡罗莱纳海岸;飓风“泽塔”(2020年)过后,路易斯安那州德尔涅尔群岛;以及路易斯安那州西南海岸,在飓风劳拉和三角洲(2020年)之后。在近200公里的海岸线上发现了数百个地物,某些地区的地物密度超过每公里20个。在沿岸,单个特征的大小从5米到500米不等,在跨海岸方向,包括出口的形成或重新激活,其尺寸也相似。这些风暴引起的回流和海流形态特征的广泛发生表明,它们在沿海进化和恢复力中的作用可能比以前认为的更为突出。基于这些观察结果,我们建议澄清归流和海流特征的术语,以区分它们与更频繁记录的陆流特征,并主张将它们纳入海岸变化危害分类方案和海岸演化形态动力学模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Online Materials: The impacts of climate change on surfing resources Engineering and design of the Lightning Point Shoreline Restoration Project in Bayou La Batre, Alabama Tidal marsh restoration at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Maryland: A case study in thin-layer placement Thin layer placement for marsh enhancement: Planning, design, construction, and monitoring considerations Evaluating direct and strategic placement of dredged material for marsh restoration through model simulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1