Towards Prioritizing Vulnerability Testing

Halit Alptekin, Simge Demir, Şevval Şimşek, Cemal Yilmaz
{"title":"Towards Prioritizing Vulnerability Testing","authors":"Halit Alptekin, Simge Demir, Şevval Şimşek, Cemal Yilmaz","doi":"10.1109/qrs-c51114.2020.00114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vulnerability assessment is the process of identifying and prioritizing the vulnerabilities in a system. Vulnerability scanners can, for example, scan a website for known vulnerabilities by running a repository of security tests, each of which is designed to reveal a known vulnerability. As the security tests need to be executed on each and every web page encountered, it may take quite a while for these scanners to report vulnerabilities. In this work, we present an approach for revealing the vulnerabilities faster by prioritizing the executions of the security tests on a per web page basis. The approach is based on a simple conjecture that “similar” web pages may possess “similar” vulnerabilities and that identifying these similarities can help prioritize the security tests. The results of the experiments we carried out by using 2927 distinct web pages (collected from 80 web sites), support our basic hypothesis; the percentages of the times the actual vulnerabilities appear in the top 8 and 15 predicted vulnerabilities were 86.9% and 98.4%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":358174,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C)","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/qrs-c51114.2020.00114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vulnerability assessment is the process of identifying and prioritizing the vulnerabilities in a system. Vulnerability scanners can, for example, scan a website for known vulnerabilities by running a repository of security tests, each of which is designed to reveal a known vulnerability. As the security tests need to be executed on each and every web page encountered, it may take quite a while for these scanners to report vulnerabilities. In this work, we present an approach for revealing the vulnerabilities faster by prioritizing the executions of the security tests on a per web page basis. The approach is based on a simple conjecture that “similar” web pages may possess “similar” vulnerabilities and that identifying these similarities can help prioritize the security tests. The results of the experiments we carried out by using 2927 distinct web pages (collected from 80 web sites), support our basic hypothesis; the percentages of the times the actual vulnerabilities appear in the top 8 and 15 predicted vulnerabilities were 86.9% and 98.4%, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对漏洞测试进行优先排序
脆弱性评估是识别系统中的脆弱性并确定其优先级的过程。例如,漏洞扫描器可以通过运行一个安全测试库来扫描一个网站,寻找已知的漏洞,每个测试库都旨在揭示一个已知的漏洞。由于安全测试需要在遇到的每个网页上执行,这些扫描器可能需要相当长的时间才能报告漏洞。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种通过在每个网页的基础上优先执行安全测试来更快地揭示漏洞的方法。该方法基于一个简单的猜想,即“相似”的网页可能具有“相似”的漏洞,并且识别这些相似性可以帮助确定安全测试的优先级。我们使用2927个不同的网页(收集自80个网站)进行的实验结果支持我们的基本假设;实际漏洞出现在预测漏洞前8名和前15名的次数分别为86.9%和98.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decomposition of Attributes Oriented Software Trustworthiness Measure Based on Axiomatic Approaches A Model-based RCM Analysis Method A Threat Analysis Methodology for Security Requirements Elicitation in Machine Learning Based Systems Timely Publication of Transaction Records in a Private Blockchain Organizing Committee QRS 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1