{"title":"Sexual Harassment Laws: Have We Gone Too Far?","authors":"Elizabeth R. Koller","doi":"10.2190/FYY7-EP4Q-FHN9-QKJW","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our forefathers based our decisions to withdraw on a simple principle: \"that all men are created equal.\" Sexual harassment laws are the latest wave in the efforts to protect our fundamental principle. The courts have rendered decisions outlawing the sexual harassment form of discrimination and allow ing victims to sue for damages. Governmental agencies have promulgated guidelines for assessing employer liability. Still, the problem persists. Recently, legislatures have begun to explore new ways of dealing with sexual harassment. These innovative approaches emphasize use of training and alternative dispute resolution. They focus on educating workers and students to respect each other and promote peaceful resolution of problematic issues. Sexual harassment laws will continue to develop until equality is achieved. Our forefathers based our decision to withdraw from English rule on one simple principle: \"that all men are created equal\" [1]. This fundamental principle stands as a shining beacon guiding immigrants to our shores. Men and women of all shapes, sizes, colors, and creeds built our country. Each lent a piece, which formed a patchwork of the highest quality. Thus, the United States should constitute a conglomerate of the best of all these various cultures. We have developed our laws in accordance with that goal. The United States Constitution, the first law ever passed in the United States, originally set up our new government: a government that gave all classes of people at least an indirect say in the passage of future laws [2]. Shortly after enacting the original Constitution, our forefathers amended the supreme law of the land to © 1995, Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. 101 doi: 10.2190/FYY7-EP4Q-FHN9-QKJW http://baywood.com","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/FYY7-EP4Q-FHN9-QKJW","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
性骚扰法律:我们是否走得太远了?
我们的先辈决定撤军是基于一个简单的原则:“人人生而平等。”性骚扰法律是保护我们基本原则的最新浪潮。法院已经作出判决,宣布性骚扰形式的歧视为非法,并允许受害者起诉要求损害赔偿。政府机构颁布了评估雇主责任的指导方针。然而,问题依然存在。最近,立法机关开始探索处理性骚扰的新方法。这些创新方法强调使用培训和替代性争端解决办法。他们的重点是教育工人和学生相互尊重,促进和平解决问题。性骚扰法律将继续发展,直到实现平等。我们的祖先决定退出英国统治,是基于一个简单的原则:“人人生而平等”[1]。这一基本原则就像一座闪亮的灯塔,指引着移民来到我们的海岸。各种体型、身材、肤色和信仰的男人和女人建设了我们的国家。每个人都出一块,形成了一个最高质量的拼凑物。因此,美国应该是所有这些不同文化中最优秀的文化的集合体。我们根据这一目标制定了法律。美国宪法是美国有史以来通过的第一部法律,它最初建立了我们的新政府:一个让所有阶层的人在未来法律的通过中至少有间接发言权的政府[2]。在最初的宪法颁布后不久,我们的先辈修改了土地的最高法律为©1995,Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. 101 doi: 10.2190/FYY7-EP4Q-FHN9-QKJW http://baywood.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。