On Distributed Sampling for Mismatched Estimation of Remote Sources

Yashodhara Pandit, Amitalok J. Budkuley
{"title":"On Distributed Sampling for Mismatched Estimation of Remote Sources","authors":"Yashodhara Pandit, Amitalok J. Budkuley","doi":"10.23919/ACC53348.2022.9867617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we study the problem of distributed sampling for the recovery of a remote source under information mismatch at the estimator. In particular, a centralized estimator seeks to estimate a remote Gaussian random signal, where unlike in the ‘classical’ estimation setup, we assume that the estimator has a fixed, unknown mismatch vis-à-vis source statistics, in particular, the source covariance matrix. Such a mismatched estimator deploys multiple samplers in the field, where each sampler observes an independently noise corrupted version of the remote source and then forwards its sampled version to the estimator. The estimator has a fixed limit on the number of samples it can concurrently process; given such a total sampling budget, it seeks to distribute these samples optimally among samplers so as to obtain a reasonably high fidelity sampled noisy observation of the remote source via the samplers. Using this sampled data, the mismatched estimator then outputs a source estimate which minimizes distortion (i.e., the overall mean squared error).Our principal goal in this work is to understand the distortion-versus-sampling rate trade-off for the mismatched Gaussian source estimation problem under general distributed configurations. In the high-rate sampling regime, where the estimator has a ‘large’ sampling budget and essentially every sampler can operate at ‘high’ sampling rate, we show the interesting result that for a wide range of parameters, the optimal distributed sampling strategy is a uniform sampling strategy but one which, interestingly, does not depend on the mismatch at the estimator. We also characterize the optimal distortion, which we show does indeed depend on the degree of mismatch. Our results also bring to the fore an interesting phenomenon where the optimal distortion behaves asymmetrically w.r.t. the nature of mismatch, i.e., even for identical mismatch magnitude, the distortion is significantly different depending on the sign of the mismatch.","PeriodicalId":366299,"journal":{"name":"2022 American Control Conference (ACC)","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 American Control Conference (ACC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC53348.2022.9867617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this work, we study the problem of distributed sampling for the recovery of a remote source under information mismatch at the estimator. In particular, a centralized estimator seeks to estimate a remote Gaussian random signal, where unlike in the ‘classical’ estimation setup, we assume that the estimator has a fixed, unknown mismatch vis-à-vis source statistics, in particular, the source covariance matrix. Such a mismatched estimator deploys multiple samplers in the field, where each sampler observes an independently noise corrupted version of the remote source and then forwards its sampled version to the estimator. The estimator has a fixed limit on the number of samples it can concurrently process; given such a total sampling budget, it seeks to distribute these samples optimally among samplers so as to obtain a reasonably high fidelity sampled noisy observation of the remote source via the samplers. Using this sampled data, the mismatched estimator then outputs a source estimate which minimizes distortion (i.e., the overall mean squared error).Our principal goal in this work is to understand the distortion-versus-sampling rate trade-off for the mismatched Gaussian source estimation problem under general distributed configurations. In the high-rate sampling regime, where the estimator has a ‘large’ sampling budget and essentially every sampler can operate at ‘high’ sampling rate, we show the interesting result that for a wide range of parameters, the optimal distributed sampling strategy is a uniform sampling strategy but one which, interestingly, does not depend on the mismatch at the estimator. We also characterize the optimal distortion, which we show does indeed depend on the degree of mismatch. Our results also bring to the fore an interesting phenomenon where the optimal distortion behaves asymmetrically w.r.t. the nature of mismatch, i.e., even for identical mismatch magnitude, the distortion is significantly different depending on the sign of the mismatch.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程源不匹配估计的分布式抽样研究
在本文中,我们研究了在估计器处信息不匹配的情况下,用于远程源恢复的分布式采样问题。特别是,集中式估计器试图估计远程高斯随机信号,与“经典”估计设置不同,我们假设估计器与-à-vis源统计数据,特别是源协方差矩阵有固定的未知不匹配。这种不匹配估计器在现场部署多个采样器,其中每个采样器观察远程源的独立噪声损坏版本,然后将其采样版本转发给估计器。估计器可以同时处理的样本数量有一个固定的限制;给定这样的总采样预算,它寻求将这些样本最优地分布在采样器之间,以便通过采样器获得对远程源的合理高保真采样噪声观测。使用这个采样数据,不匹配估计器然后输出一个源估计,使失真最小化(即,总体均方误差)。我们在这项工作中的主要目标是了解在一般分布配置下不匹配高斯源估计问题的失真与采样率权衡。在高速率采样状态下,估计器有一个“大”的采样预算,基本上每个采样器都可以以“高”的采样率运行,我们展示了一个有趣的结果,对于大范围的参数,最优的分布式采样策略是一个统一的采样策略,但有趣的是,它不依赖于估计器的不匹配。我们还描述了最优失真,我们表明这确实取决于不匹配的程度。我们的结果还突出了一个有趣的现象,即最佳失真与失配的性质不对称,即即使对于相同的失配幅度,失真也会因失配的标志而显着不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Connectivity during Multi-agent Consensus Dynamics via Model Predictive Control Gradient-Based Optimization for Anti-Windup PID Controls Power Management for Noise Aware Path Planning of Hybrid UAVs Fixed-Time Seeking and Tracking of Time-Varying Nash Equilibria in Noncooperative Games Aerial Interception of Non-Cooperative Intruder using Model Predictive Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1