Bias Analysis for Misclassification Errors in both the Response Variable and Covariate

Juxin Liu, Annshirley Afful, H. Mansell, Yanyuan Ma
{"title":"Bias Analysis for Misclassification Errors in both the Response Variable and Covariate","authors":"Juxin Liu, Annshirley Afful, H. Mansell, Yanyuan Ma","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2022.2066725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract– Much literature has focused on statistical inference for misclassified response variables or misclassified covariates. However, misclassification in both the response variable and the covariate has received very limited attention within applied fields and the statistics community. In situations where the response variable and the covariate are simultaneously subject to misclassification errors, an assumption of independent misclassification errors is often used for convenience without justification. This article aims to show the harmful consequences of inappropriate adjustment for joint misclassification errors. In particular, we focus on the wrong adjustment by ignoring the dependence between the misclassification process of the response variable and the covariate. In this article, the dependence of misclassification in both variables is characterized by covariance-type parameters. We extend the original definition of dependence parameters to a more general setting. We discover a single quantity that governs the dependence of the two misclassification processes. Moreover, we propose likelihood ratio tests to check the nondifferential/independent misclassification assumption in main study/internal validation study designs. Our simulation studies indicate that ignoring the dependent error structure can be even worse than ignoring all the misclassification errors when the validation data size is relatively small. The methodology is illustrated by a real data example.","PeriodicalId":342642,"journal":{"name":"The American Statistician","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2022.2066725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract– Much literature has focused on statistical inference for misclassified response variables or misclassified covariates. However, misclassification in both the response variable and the covariate has received very limited attention within applied fields and the statistics community. In situations where the response variable and the covariate are simultaneously subject to misclassification errors, an assumption of independent misclassification errors is often used for convenience without justification. This article aims to show the harmful consequences of inappropriate adjustment for joint misclassification errors. In particular, we focus on the wrong adjustment by ignoring the dependence between the misclassification process of the response variable and the covariate. In this article, the dependence of misclassification in both variables is characterized by covariance-type parameters. We extend the original definition of dependence parameters to a more general setting. We discover a single quantity that governs the dependence of the two misclassification processes. Moreover, we propose likelihood ratio tests to check the nondifferential/independent misclassification assumption in main study/internal validation study designs. Our simulation studies indicate that ignoring the dependent error structure can be even worse than ignoring all the misclassification errors when the validation data size is relatively small. The methodology is illustrated by a real data example.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
响应变量和协变量误分类误差的偏倚分析
摘要:许多文献都集中在错误分类的响应变量或错误分类的协变量的统计推断上。然而,响应变量和协变量的错误分类在应用领域和统计界受到的关注非常有限。在响应变量和协变量同时存在误分类误差的情况下,为了方便起见,通常采用独立误分类误差的假设。本文旨在说明联合误分类误差调整不当的有害后果。特别是,我们通过忽略响应变量的错误分类过程与协变量之间的依赖关系来关注错误调整。在本文中,误分类在两个变量中的依赖关系用协方差型参数来表征。我们将依赖参数的原始定义扩展到更一般的设置。我们发现了一个单独的量来控制两个错误分类过程的依赖性。此外,我们提出了似然比检验来检验主研究/内部验证研究设计中的非微分/独立错分类假设。我们的仿真研究表明,当验证数据规模相对较小时,忽略相关的错误结构可能比忽略所有的误分类错误更糟糕。通过一个实际数据实例说明了该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review of Design of Experiments courses offered to undergraduate students at American universities On Misuses of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for One-Sample Goodness-of-Fit Sequential Selection for Minimizing the Variance with Application to Crystallization Experiments Sequential Selection for Minimizing the Variance with Application to Crystallization Experiments Introduction to Stochastic Finance with Market Examples, 2nd ed Introduction to Stochastic Finance with Market Examples, 2nd ed . Nicolas Privault, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2023, x + 652 pp., $120.00(H), ISBN 978-1-032-28826-0.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1