Evaluating project management criteria using fuzzy analytic hierarchy Process

Husam Jasim Mohammed, Ihsan Ali Mubarak Al-Jubori, M. M. Kasim
{"title":"Evaluating project management criteria using fuzzy analytic hierarchy Process","authors":"Husam Jasim Mohammed, Ihsan Ali Mubarak Al-Jubori, M. M. Kasim","doi":"10.1063/1.5121097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Project management is one of the most important issues to fulfil organizational objectives. The project management criteria are playing a vital role for completion of any project. The aim of this paper is to evaluate five main project criteria (time, cost, quality, risk, and safety) mathematically by using a multi-criteria method in order to assist stakeholders or project managers in decision-making. The fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is selected with the use of triangular fuzzy numbers for pairwise comparison scales in prioritizing the criteria in managing projects. Utilizing the fuzzy AHP technique can facilitate uncertainty in doing evaluation. In this study, one expert who is a project manager with many years of experience was asked to carry out the evaluation. The results show that the expert’s main concern in managing project is time, and cost is the second important. The study demonstrates how uncertainty in making evaluation of multiple criteria can be solved by using fuzzy method such as fuzzy AHP, in contrary to the crisp or the traditional AHP which is based on specific values, the evaluator(s) are always ambiguous and vague to give exact judgment. Hence, the application of this fuzzy method can make the assessment outcomes more accurate, scientific, and objective. It is anticipated that this work may serve as a support tool for stakeholders in improving the project management quality level.Project management is one of the most important issues to fulfil organizational objectives. The project management criteria are playing a vital role for completion of any project. The aim of this paper is to evaluate five main project criteria (time, cost, quality, risk, and safety) mathematically by using a multi-criteria method in order to assist stakeholders or project managers in decision-making. The fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is selected with the use of triangular fuzzy numbers for pairwise comparison scales in prioritizing the criteria in managing projects. Utilizing the fuzzy AHP technique can facilitate uncertainty in doing evaluation. In this study, one expert who is a project manager with many years of experience was asked to carry out the evaluation. The results show that the expert’s main concern in managing project is time, and cost is the second important. The study demonstrates how uncertainty in making evaluation of multiple criteria can be solved by using fuzzy method such as ...","PeriodicalId":325925,"journal":{"name":"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Project management is one of the most important issues to fulfil organizational objectives. The project management criteria are playing a vital role for completion of any project. The aim of this paper is to evaluate five main project criteria (time, cost, quality, risk, and safety) mathematically by using a multi-criteria method in order to assist stakeholders or project managers in decision-making. The fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is selected with the use of triangular fuzzy numbers for pairwise comparison scales in prioritizing the criteria in managing projects. Utilizing the fuzzy AHP technique can facilitate uncertainty in doing evaluation. In this study, one expert who is a project manager with many years of experience was asked to carry out the evaluation. The results show that the expert’s main concern in managing project is time, and cost is the second important. The study demonstrates how uncertainty in making evaluation of multiple criteria can be solved by using fuzzy method such as fuzzy AHP, in contrary to the crisp or the traditional AHP which is based on specific values, the evaluator(s) are always ambiguous and vague to give exact judgment. Hence, the application of this fuzzy method can make the assessment outcomes more accurate, scientific, and objective. It is anticipated that this work may serve as a support tool for stakeholders in improving the project management quality level.Project management is one of the most important issues to fulfil organizational objectives. The project management criteria are playing a vital role for completion of any project. The aim of this paper is to evaluate five main project criteria (time, cost, quality, risk, and safety) mathematically by using a multi-criteria method in order to assist stakeholders or project managers in decision-making. The fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is selected with the use of triangular fuzzy numbers for pairwise comparison scales in prioritizing the criteria in managing projects. Utilizing the fuzzy AHP technique can facilitate uncertainty in doing evaluation. In this study, one expert who is a project manager with many years of experience was asked to carry out the evaluation. The results show that the expert’s main concern in managing project is time, and cost is the second important. The study demonstrates how uncertainty in making evaluation of multiple criteria can be solved by using fuzzy method such as ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用模糊层次分析法评价项目管理标准
项目管理是实现组织目标的最重要问题之一。项目管理准则对任何项目的完成都起着至关重要的作用。本文的目的是通过使用多标准方法对五个主要项目标准(时间、成本、质量、风险和安全)进行数学评估,以帮助利益相关者或项目经理进行决策。采用模糊层次分析法(AHP),利用三角模糊数进行两两比较,确定项目管理中各指标的优先级。利用模糊层次分析法可以消除不确定性。在本研究中,一位具有多年经验的项目经理专家被要求进行评估。结果表明,专家在项目管理中最关心的是时间,其次是成本。研究表明,利用模糊层次分析法等模糊方法可以解决多准则评价中的不确定性问题,而传统的层次分析法以具体的数值为基础,评价者往往模棱两可,难以给出准确的判断。因此,应用该模糊方法可以使评价结果更加准确、科学、客观。预期这项工作可以作为一种辅助工具,帮助利益相关者提高项目管理的质量水平。项目管理是实现组织目标的最重要问题之一。项目管理准则对任何项目的完成都起着至关重要的作用。本文的目的是通过使用多标准方法对五个主要项目标准(时间、成本、质量、风险和安全)进行数学评估,以帮助利益相关者或项目经理进行决策。采用模糊层次分析法(AHP),利用三角模糊数进行两两比较,确定项目管理中各指标的优先级。利用模糊层次分析法可以消除不确定性。在本研究中,一位具有多年经验的项目经理专家被要求进行评估。结果表明,专家在项目管理中最关心的是时间,其次是成本。研究表明,如何利用模糊方法解决多准则评价中的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of artificial intelligence in predicting ground settlement on earth slope The most important contaminants of air pollutants in Klang station using multivariate statistical analysis Tourism knowledge discovery through data mining techniques On some specific patterns of τ-adic non-adjacent form expansion over ring Z(τ): An alternative formula Exploratory factor analysis on occupational stress in context of Malaysian sewerage operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1