Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act: A Step in the Wrong Direction

S. Deneault
{"title":"Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act: A Step in the Wrong Direction","authors":"S. Deneault","doi":"10.18060/18282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taxes have become the lifeblood of modern society and epitomize the power of the collective over the desires of the individual. When a group of people comes together and joins a society, it surrenders some individual rights and desires for the greater good. For the desires of the collective to be effectuated, there needs to be a physical representation of that collective will. As the physical manifestation of the collective will comes together it requires a collection from the individuals to effectuate the needs of the many, and this is the basis of taxation. However, because the physical manifestation of the collective will requires an individual to sacrifice the fruits of her labor, there is an inherent conflict between the individual and society as a whole. This conflict between the individual and society boils down to basic human nature and is at the root of any discussion regarding tax avoidance. Tax collection by the government and tax avoidance by citizens are manifestations of the desires of the individual conflicting with the needs of the collective. In the United States, tax avoidance is a zero-sum game between the taxpayer and the United States with the deck stacked heavily in favor of the government. An apt metaphor for the interactions between the","PeriodicalId":230320,"journal":{"name":"Indiana international and comparative law review","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana international and comparative law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/18282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxes have become the lifeblood of modern society and epitomize the power of the collective over the desires of the individual. When a group of people comes together and joins a society, it surrenders some individual rights and desires for the greater good. For the desires of the collective to be effectuated, there needs to be a physical representation of that collective will. As the physical manifestation of the collective will comes together it requires a collection from the individuals to effectuate the needs of the many, and this is the basis of taxation. However, because the physical manifestation of the collective will requires an individual to sacrifice the fruits of her labor, there is an inherent conflict between the individual and society as a whole. This conflict between the individual and society boils down to basic human nature and is at the root of any discussion regarding tax avoidance. Tax collection by the government and tax avoidance by citizens are manifestations of the desires of the individual conflicting with the needs of the collective. In the United States, tax avoidance is a zero-sum game between the taxpayer and the United States with the deck stacked heavily in favor of the government. An apt metaphor for the interactions between the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《海外账户税收遵从法案》:朝着错误方向迈出的一步
税收已经成为现代社会的命脉,是集体力量凌驾于个人欲望之上的缩影。当一群人聚集在一起加入一个社会时,为了更大的利益,他们放弃了一些个人权利和愿望。为了实现集体的愿望,需要有一个集体意志的物理表现形式。当集体意志的物质表现聚集在一起时,它需要从个人那里收集来实现许多人的需求,这就是税收的基础。然而,由于集体意志的物质表现需要个人牺牲自己的劳动成果,因此个人与整个社会之间存在着内在的冲突。这种个人与社会之间的冲突归结为基本的人性,是任何有关避税的讨论的根源。政府的税收征收和公民的避税是个人欲望与集体需求冲突的表现。在美国,避税是纳税人和美国之间的零和游戏,政府在这张牌上占了很大优势。这是一个恰当的比喻
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sanctimonious Barbarity: The Forced Pregnancy Alito Dobbs Opinion Self-Determination: What Lessons from Kashmir? Striking a Balance: Extending Minimum Rights to U.S. Gig Economy Workers Based on E.U. Directive 2019/1153 on Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Issue Preclusion Out of the U.S. (?) The Evolution of the Italian Doctrine of Res Judicata in Comparative Context Animal Welfare, Who Cares? Why the United Nations Needs to Tackle Horse-Soring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1