Oral cavity reconstruction with pedicled and free flaps: A single institutional experience

Z. Teli, R. Kantharia, Shehnaz R. Kantharia, S. Vyas, Y. Bhatt, Piyush Doshi
{"title":"Oral cavity reconstruction with pedicled and free flaps: A single institutional experience","authors":"Z. Teli, R. Kantharia, Shehnaz R. Kantharia, S. Vyas, Y. Bhatt, Piyush Doshi","doi":"10.4103/oji.oji_10_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In Indian subcontinent, oral cavity cancer is the most common cancer in males and the 4th most common in females. Seventy percent of these patients present in advanced stages and resection of these advanced cancers lead to complex orofacial defects requiring primary reconstruction to restore form, function, and cosmesis. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the results of pedicled and microvascular free flaps (MFFs) for oral cavity defects following resection of locally advanced oral cancer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent composite resection followed by reconstruction with pedicled or MFFs for locally advanced oral cancer from January 2018 to September 2019 was done. The demographic details, primary tumor site, tumor stage, defect type, flap type, and complication rates were analyzed. Results: Primary reconstruction was offered to 540 patients with pedicled flaps for 421 patients and MFFs for 119 patients. Patient distribution as per current Tumor, Node, and Metastasis staging was pT1/T2: 91, pT3: 179, and pT4: 270. Reconstruction offered for different oral cavity subsites was – buccal mucosa (n = 374), retromolar trigone (n = 10), alveolus (n = 75), tongue (n = 52), lower gingivobuccal sulcus (n = 11), floor of mouth (n = 4), upper gingivobuccal sulcus (n = 5), and lower lip (n = 9). We classified the types of defects into mucosal (n = 32), mucosal with bone (n = 370), mucosal with bone and skin (n = 101), mucosal with skin (n = 14), skin (n = 3), and central mandibular arch (n = 20). The overall rate of complications in pedicled flaps was 12.11% and MFFs was 20.16%. The success rate for pedicled flaps was 100% and for MFFs was 94.96%. Conclusion: In our study, MFF reconstruction had a good success rate with satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes.","PeriodicalId":431823,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Journal of India","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/oji.oji_10_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Indian subcontinent, oral cavity cancer is the most common cancer in males and the 4th most common in females. Seventy percent of these patients present in advanced stages and resection of these advanced cancers lead to complex orofacial defects requiring primary reconstruction to restore form, function, and cosmesis. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the results of pedicled and microvascular free flaps (MFFs) for oral cavity defects following resection of locally advanced oral cancer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent composite resection followed by reconstruction with pedicled or MFFs for locally advanced oral cancer from January 2018 to September 2019 was done. The demographic details, primary tumor site, tumor stage, defect type, flap type, and complication rates were analyzed. Results: Primary reconstruction was offered to 540 patients with pedicled flaps for 421 patients and MFFs for 119 patients. Patient distribution as per current Tumor, Node, and Metastasis staging was pT1/T2: 91, pT3: 179, and pT4: 270. Reconstruction offered for different oral cavity subsites was – buccal mucosa (n = 374), retromolar trigone (n = 10), alveolus (n = 75), tongue (n = 52), lower gingivobuccal sulcus (n = 11), floor of mouth (n = 4), upper gingivobuccal sulcus (n = 5), and lower lip (n = 9). We classified the types of defects into mucosal (n = 32), mucosal with bone (n = 370), mucosal with bone and skin (n = 101), mucosal with skin (n = 14), skin (n = 3), and central mandibular arch (n = 20). The overall rate of complications in pedicled flaps was 12.11% and MFFs was 20.16%. The success rate for pedicled flaps was 100% and for MFFs was 94.96%. Conclusion: In our study, MFF reconstruction had a good success rate with satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带蒂和自由皮瓣重建口腔:单一的机构经验
背景:在印度次大陆,口腔癌是男性最常见的癌症,在女性中排名第四。70%的患者处于晚期,这些晚期癌症的切除导致复杂的口面部缺陷,需要初级重建以恢复形态、功能和外观。目的:评价带蒂微血管游离皮瓣(MFFs)修复局部晚期口腔癌术后口腔缺损的效果。材料与方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年9月局部晚期口腔癌患者行复合切除后带蒂或MFFs重建的前瞻性数据。分析患者的人口学资料、原发肿瘤部位、肿瘤分期、缺损类型、皮瓣类型及并发症发生率。结果:540例患者行带蒂皮瓣重建421例,MFFs重建119例。根据当前肿瘤、淋巴结和转移分期,患者分布为pT1/T2: 91, pT3: 179, pT4: 270。重建提供不同的口腔子站——颊粘膜(n = 374), retromolar膀胱三角区(n = 10),肺泡(n = 75),舌(n = 52),降低gingivobuccal沟(n = 11),嘴(n = 4),地板上gingivobuccal沟(n = 5),下唇(n = 9)。我们的缺陷类型分为粘膜(n = 32),粘膜与骨(n = 370),粘膜与骨骼和皮肤(n = 101)、粘膜和皮肤(n = 14)、皮肤(n = 3),和中央下颌弓(n = 20)。带蒂皮瓣的总并发症发生率为12.11%,MFFs为20.16%。带蒂皮瓣的成功率为100%,MFFs的成功率为94.96%。结论:本研究MFF重建成功率高,功能及美观效果满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma of the thyroid: A rare case Burned-out testicular tumor presenting as cervical and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy Nasal sebaceous carcinoma: A case treated at a tertiary care center Xanthogranulomatous hypophysitis masquerading as pituitary macroadenoma Cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab with or without prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy: A prospective study from a tertiary cancer institute at Guwahati, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1