Preemptive analgesia for primary dysmenorrhea : A randomized controlled clinical trial

H. Nabil, H. Youssef, S. Tawfeek, W. Elrefaie
{"title":"Preemptive analgesia for primary dysmenorrhea : A randomized controlled clinical trial","authors":"H. Nabil, H. Youssef, S. Tawfeek, W. Elrefaie","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2020.42330.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spasmodic dysmenorrhea is one of the commonest painful attacks that affects young ladies. Non steroidalanti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs are considered as one of the main treatment options. Different pain management modalities concern with pretreatment with analgesia before the painful stimuli that defined as preemptive analgesia.Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the possible effect of administration of NSAIDs before the onset of pain in the anticipating menstrual cycle.  Materials and Methods: One hundered young ladies ranged from 15-25 years old were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received mefinamic acid 2 days before the anticipating date of menstruation and continued throughout the first 2 days of menstruation and group 2 received the same medication however started with the onset of symptoms only.  Results: Both groups were comparable regarding age, education and menstrual characters. The average pain score was nearly the same in both groups (8.78 ± 1.07 and 8.66 ± 1.04) and it was significantly decrease after intervention in both groups. The decrease in pain score was more in the girls treated before menstruation (4.24 ± 1.57) compared to (7.20 ± 1.77) in the girls treated after onset of menstruation and the difference was statistically significant. The percentage decrease in pain score among the girls of premenstrual treatment ranged from 14.28% to 80.0% with median decrease 55.56%, compared to 0.0% to 62.5% with median decrease 10.56% in the group treated at onset of menstruation. The difference was also statistically significant (P <0.001). Conclusion: NSAIDS can be used effectively to prevent and control primary dysmenorrhea associated symtoms if used before the appearance of symptoms, and targeted groups are in great chance to practice an easier life throughout the entiremenstrual cycle.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"297 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2020.42330.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spasmodic dysmenorrhea is one of the commonest painful attacks that affects young ladies. Non steroidalanti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs are considered as one of the main treatment options. Different pain management modalities concern with pretreatment with analgesia before the painful stimuli that defined as preemptive analgesia.Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the possible effect of administration of NSAIDs before the onset of pain in the anticipating menstrual cycle.  Materials and Methods: One hundered young ladies ranged from 15-25 years old were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received mefinamic acid 2 days before the anticipating date of menstruation and continued throughout the first 2 days of menstruation and group 2 received the same medication however started with the onset of symptoms only.  Results: Both groups were comparable regarding age, education and menstrual characters. The average pain score was nearly the same in both groups (8.78 ± 1.07 and 8.66 ± 1.04) and it was significantly decrease after intervention in both groups. The decrease in pain score was more in the girls treated before menstruation (4.24 ± 1.57) compared to (7.20 ± 1.77) in the girls treated after onset of menstruation and the difference was statistically significant. The percentage decrease in pain score among the girls of premenstrual treatment ranged from 14.28% to 80.0% with median decrease 55.56%, compared to 0.0% to 62.5% with median decrease 10.56% in the group treated at onset of menstruation. The difference was also statistically significant (P <0.001). Conclusion: NSAIDS can be used effectively to prevent and control primary dysmenorrhea associated symtoms if used before the appearance of symptoms, and targeted groups are in great chance to practice an easier life throughout the entiremenstrual cycle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先发制人镇痛治疗原发性痛经:一项随机对照临床试验
背景:痉挛性痛经是影响年轻女性最常见的疼痛发作之一。非甾体抗炎(NSAID)药物被认为是主要的治疗选择之一。不同的疼痛管理模式关注疼痛刺激前的预处理镇痛,定义为先发制人的镇痛。目的:本研究旨在评价非甾体抗炎药在预期月经周期疼痛发作前的可能效果。材料与方法:100名年龄在15-25岁的年轻女性随机分为两组。组1在月经预产期前2天服用甲非那明酸,并持续到月经的前2天;组2服用同样的药物,但仅在出现症状时开始服用。结果:两组在年龄、受教育程度和月经特征方面具有可比性。两组患者的平均疼痛评分基本相同,分别为8.78±1.07和8.66±1.04,干预后两组疼痛评分均显著降低。月经前治疗组疼痛评分下降幅度(4.24±1.57)大于月经后治疗组(7.20±1.77),差异有统计学意义。经前治疗组疼痛评分下降百分比为14.28% ~ 80.0%,中位下降55.56%;经初治疗组疼痛评分下降百分比为0.0% ~ 62.5%,中位下降10.56%。差异也有统计学意义(P <0.001)。结论:在症状出现前使用非甾体抗炎药可有效预防和控制原发性痛经相关症状,目标人群在整个月经周期内更有可能过上更轻松的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, a prospective randomized controlled study Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia Cervical cerclage for Pregnant Women at High-risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth can act beyond its Mechanical Action New ultrasound signs for prediction of early placental Insufficiency Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss During and After Elective Lower‐Segment Cesarean Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1