Divorce Mediation at Religious Courts in Pasangkayu during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Socio-Juridical Analysis

Gasim Yamani, Nazil Fahmi, Muhammad Akbar
{"title":"Divorce Mediation at Religious Courts in Pasangkayu during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Socio-Juridical Analysis","authors":"Gasim Yamani, Nazil Fahmi, Muhammad Akbar","doi":"10.24239/ijcils.vol4.iss1.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the application of divorce mediation and explains the factors that influence mediation practices during the Covid-19 pandemic at the Religious Courts in Pasangkayu. As part of the alternative settlement of disputed cases, mediation has changed its implementation, including in the practice of law in religious courts. This study uses a socio-juridical approach to examine qualitative data obtained from field research through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. This study presents three conclusions. First, divorce mediation includes pre-mediation, which is carried out privately, and its implementation is based on the situation. Second, several enabling and inhibiting factors influence the practice of meditation. Third, from a socio-juridical perspective, mediation is a construction guided by the principle of agreement carried out through deliberation and consultation regarding disputes. In addition to adhering to a positive legal system, mediation in religious courts in Indonesia attaches to the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs Number 1 of 2006 and the process of judging (tahkim) procedure in Islamic law. The influence of local customs and culture on the implementation of mediation in religious courts is not by the objectives of Islamic law and positive law, which is oriented toward the peaceful settlement of disputes and good faith.","PeriodicalId":385273,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC LAW AND SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC LAW AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24239/ijcils.vol4.iss1.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes the application of divorce mediation and explains the factors that influence mediation practices during the Covid-19 pandemic at the Religious Courts in Pasangkayu. As part of the alternative settlement of disputed cases, mediation has changed its implementation, including in the practice of law in religious courts. This study uses a socio-juridical approach to examine qualitative data obtained from field research through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. This study presents three conclusions. First, divorce mediation includes pre-mediation, which is carried out privately, and its implementation is based on the situation. Second, several enabling and inhibiting factors influence the practice of meditation. Third, from a socio-juridical perspective, mediation is a construction guided by the principle of agreement carried out through deliberation and consultation regarding disputes. In addition to adhering to a positive legal system, mediation in religious courts in Indonesia attaches to the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs Number 1 of 2006 and the process of judging (tahkim) procedure in Islamic law. The influence of local customs and culture on the implementation of mediation in religious courts is not by the objectives of Islamic law and positive law, which is oriented toward the peaceful settlement of disputes and good faith.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情期间Pasangkayu宗教法院的离婚调解:社会-法律分析
本文介绍了新冠肺炎疫情期间帕桑卡尤宗教法院离婚调解的应用情况,并解释了影响调解实践的因素。作为解决争议案件的另一种方式,调解的实施方式发生了变化,包括在宗教法庭的法律实践中。本研究采用社会法学方法,通过观察、深度访谈和文献资料来检验从实地研究中获得的定性数据。本研究得出三个结论。第一,离婚调解包括事前调解,事前调解是私下进行的,其实施是根据情况而定的。其次,一些有利因素和抑制因素影响冥想的练习。第三,从社会法学的角度看,调解是一种以协商一致原则为指导的纠纷调解建设。除了坚持积极的法律制度外,印度尼西亚宗教法庭的调解还遵循2006年第1号宗教事务部长条例和伊斯兰法中的判决程序(tahkim)。当地习俗和文化对在宗教法庭实施调解的影响不符合伊斯兰法和成文法的目标,成文法的目标是和平解决争端和以诚信为导向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Reasons for Filing Underage Marriage Dispensation Post Amendment to The Marriage Law Number 01 of 1974 by Law Number 16 of 2019 Legal Consequences on Sirri Marriage Performers Without the Permission of the First Wife: Perspective of Islamic Law and Positive Law Analysis of the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council on the Legal Consequences of Violations of Divorce Taklik in Momunu District, Buol Regency The Tradition of the Twins Mayang in Javanese Tribe Community Wedding in Sukamaju Village, Banggai District in the Perspective of Islamic Law Acculturation of Islamic Law and Local Culture in Marriage Customs of the Buol People: An Anthropological Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1