Gender Dentistry A Systematic Review of Literature on Caries And Periodontitis

M. Geibel, J. Schwarz, A. Schramm
{"title":"Gender Dentistry A Systematic Review of Literature on Caries And Periodontitis","authors":"M. Geibel, J. Schwarz, A. Schramm","doi":"10.31038/jdmr.2018123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Already in the 1980s, the World Health Organization (WHO) has postulated to analyze in all medical fields differences between the sexes. But until now there is a disturbing lack of scientifically based and meaningful data over the whole area of gender dentistry – for prevention as well as for treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the actual situation described as an IS-analysis of literature review on the topic of gender dentistry with the subthemes periodontal disease and tooth decay in the leading medical databases (Medline, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, Your Journals@Ovid, The Cochrane Library). We discuss these on the basis of an evidence-based guideline. For periodontal diseases we found no clear trend. Some studies showed no gender difference, others showed a higher prevalence for women or a higher prevalence for men. At the juvenile periodontitis and the occurring bacteria of periodontitis there were conflicting results as well. No simple statement can be made with respect to tooth decay, too. Respective studies merely show age as an important item. Totally it has to be noted that the scientific validity of some studies is not without any doubt as they are conducted with a too low number of clinical trials. Several studies are more than 15 years old, therefor providing a serious gender specific treatment in dentistry, future studies must increasingly incorporate and intensively discuss gender specific aspects.","PeriodicalId":326702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/jdmr.2018123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Already in the 1980s, the World Health Organization (WHO) has postulated to analyze in all medical fields differences between the sexes. But until now there is a disturbing lack of scientifically based and meaningful data over the whole area of gender dentistry – for prevention as well as for treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the actual situation described as an IS-analysis of literature review on the topic of gender dentistry with the subthemes periodontal disease and tooth decay in the leading medical databases (Medline, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, Your Journals@Ovid, The Cochrane Library). We discuss these on the basis of an evidence-based guideline. For periodontal diseases we found no clear trend. Some studies showed no gender difference, others showed a higher prevalence for women or a higher prevalence for men. At the juvenile periodontitis and the occurring bacteria of periodontitis there were conflicting results as well. No simple statement can be made with respect to tooth decay, too. Respective studies merely show age as an important item. Totally it has to be noted that the scientific validity of some studies is not without any doubt as they are conducted with a too low number of clinical trials. Several studies are more than 15 years old, therefor providing a serious gender specific treatment in dentistry, future studies must increasingly incorporate and intensively discuss gender specific aspects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别牙科:关于龋齿和牙周炎的文献系统综述
早在20世纪80年代,世界卫生组织(卫生组织)就已假定在所有医学领域分析两性之间的差异。但到目前为止,令人不安的是,在整个性别牙科领域,无论是预防还是治疗,都缺乏科学依据和有意义的数据。本研究的目的是评估主要医学数据库(Medline, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, Your Journals@Ovid, The Cochrane Library)中关于性别牙科的子主题牙周病和蛀牙的文献综述的is分析所描述的实际情况。我们在循证指南的基础上讨论这些问题。对于牙周病,我们没有发现明显的趋势。一些研究显示没有性别差异,另一些则显示女性或男性的患病率更高。在青少年牙周炎和发生的牙周炎细菌也有矛盾的结果。关于蛀牙也没有简单的说法。各自的研究仅仅表明年龄是一个重要的项目。必须指出的是,一些研究的科学有效性并非毫无疑问,因为它们是在临床试验数量太少的情况下进行的。有几项研究已经超过15年了,因此,为了在牙科中提供严肃的性别特异性治疗,未来的研究必须越来越多地纳入并深入讨论性别特异性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of Selected Over-the-Counter Toothpastes in the Management of Dentine Hypersensitivity The Application of Case-Based Learning in Endodontics Morphological Variation of Permanent Mandibular First Molar (Radix Entomolaris) (In vivo Study) Effects of Selected Primers and Vanishes on Open Dentine Tubules: An SEM Study The Effect of Loading of Bioactive Glass in Desensitizing Polishing Pastes on Tubular Occlusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1