Exploring the "distance" between MOOC forums: A comparative study on discussion topics

Anastasios Ntourmas, N. Avouris, S. Daskalaki, Y. Dimitriadis
{"title":"Exploring the \"distance\" between MOOC forums: A comparative study on discussion topics","authors":"Anastasios Ntourmas, N. Avouris, S. Daskalaki, Y. Dimitriadis","doi":"10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we attempt to measure the semantic distance between forum dialogues in five MOOCs of different subject matters (humanities, mathematics and computing). We examine if such distance can provide evidence of transferable linguistic features, suggesting transferability of forum classification models. For this purpose, we employed Latent Dirichlet Allocation in order to extract the main discussion topics for each MOOC and proceeded to a pairwise semantic comparison between them. We focused on three categories of forum topics, i.e., Content-Related, Logistics-Related and Social Building. In the Content-Related discussions, the study confirmed semantic distance between the humanities course and the other four, while the distances among the mathematics and computing courses were shorter than expected. On the other hand, Logistics-Related and Social Building topics contained a more transferable set of features. The approach that we followed provides insights that could help MOOC researchers interpret the transferable features of their available data to employ in their classification tasks.","PeriodicalId":170895,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we attempt to measure the semantic distance between forum dialogues in five MOOCs of different subject matters (humanities, mathematics and computing). We examine if such distance can provide evidence of transferable linguistic features, suggesting transferability of forum classification models. For this purpose, we employed Latent Dirichlet Allocation in order to extract the main discussion topics for each MOOC and proceeded to a pairwise semantic comparison between them. We focused on three categories of forum topics, i.e., Content-Related, Logistics-Related and Social Building. In the Content-Related discussions, the study confirmed semantic distance between the humanities course and the other four, while the distances among the mathematics and computing courses were shorter than expected. On the other hand, Logistics-Related and Social Building topics contained a more transferable set of features. The approach that we followed provides insights that could help MOOC researchers interpret the transferable features of their available data to employ in their classification tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨MOOC论坛之间的“距离”:讨论话题的比较研究
在本文中,我们试图测量五个不同学科(人文、数学和计算)的mooc论坛对话之间的语义距离。我们研究了这种距离是否可以提供可转移的语言特征的证据,表明论坛分类模型的可转移性。为此,我们采用了Latent Dirichlet Allocation来提取每个MOOC的主要讨论主题,并在它们之间进行两两语义比较。我们集中讨论了三类论坛主题,即内容相关、物流相关和社会建设。在内容相关的讨论中,研究证实了人文课程与其他四门课程之间的语义距离,而数学和计算机课程之间的距离比预期的要短。另一方面,物流相关和社会建设主题包含了一组更可转移的特征。我们遵循的方法提供了一些见解,可以帮助MOOC研究人员解释他们可用数据的可转移特征,以便在他们的分类任务中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Micro-Prompt: A Strategy for Designing Pedagogically Effective Assignment Free Micro-Lectures for Online Education Systems An Exploratory Study to Identify Learners' Programming Behavior Interactions Automatic and Intelligent Recommendations to Support Students’ Self-Regulation VEA: A Virtual Environment for Animal experimentation Teachers’ Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Assessment Tools: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1