Advanced age; not a contraindiction for resections of colorectal liver metastasis recurrence

R. Sönmez
{"title":"Advanced age; not a contraindiction for resections of colorectal liver metastasis recurrence","authors":"R. Sönmez","doi":"10.38053/acmj.1257547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The influence of advanced age on the outcome of repeat resections performed for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is ill-defined. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeat resections performed for the recurrence of CLMs in younger (≤70 years) and elderly patients (70< years), and to define predictive factors of survival. \nMaterial and Method: A prospectively maintained database of a single center including 291 CLM patients between 1998 and 2019 was analyzed retrospectively. Short and long-term outcomes were compared among younger (n=99, 34%) and elderly (n=192, 66%) patient groups who were treated by repeat resections for CLM recurrence. \nResults: Although statistically not significant, analysis of different age groups (≤70, 70-75, 75-80, and 80< years) have given similar results in terms of 1, 3, and 5-year survival (p=0.143). Globally curative resection was validated as a determinant factor in the estimation of survival following resections performed for recurrences according to multivariate analysis (p","PeriodicalId":307693,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1257547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The influence of advanced age on the outcome of repeat resections performed for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is ill-defined. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeat resections performed for the recurrence of CLMs in younger (≤70 years) and elderly patients (70< years), and to define predictive factors of survival. Material and Method: A prospectively maintained database of a single center including 291 CLM patients between 1998 and 2019 was analyzed retrospectively. Short and long-term outcomes were compared among younger (n=99, 34%) and elderly (n=192, 66%) patient groups who were treated by repeat resections for CLM recurrence. Results: Although statistically not significant, analysis of different age groups (≤70, 70-75, 75-80, and 80< years) have given similar results in terms of 1, 3, and 5-year survival (p=0.143). Globally curative resection was validated as a determinant factor in the estimation of survival following resections performed for recurrences according to multivariate analysis (p
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先进的年龄;结直肠肝转移复发切除不忌讳
目的:高龄对结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)重复手术疗效的影响尚不明确。我们的目的是评估年轻(≤70岁)和老年(70岁以下)CLMs复发患者进行重复切除的安全性和有效性,并确定生存的预测因素。材料与方法:回顾性分析1998年至2019年期间包含291例CLM患者的单中心前瞻性数据库。比较年轻(n=99, 34%)和老年(n=192, 66%)两组因CLM复发而接受重复切除治疗的患者的短期和长期结果。结果:不同年龄组(≤70岁、70-75岁、75-80岁、80<岁)的1、3、5年生存率分析结果相似,差异无统计学意义(p=0.143)。根据多变量分析,全球治愈性切除被证实是估计复发切除后生存率的决定性因素(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pan-immune inflammation value as a biomarker in ankylosing spondilitis and associated with disease activity ChatGPT in medical writing: enhancing healthcare communication through artificial intelligence and human expertise Temporal alterations in P-wave electrocardiographic metrics post patent foramen ovale closure: a retrospective study Asymptomatic COVID-19 and structural changes in the brain Exploring the nexus: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical correlations of urinary tract infections in diabetes mellitus patients - a comprehensive retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1