A New Movement Based on Old Ideas

J. Macdonald, C. Branas, R. Stokes
{"title":"A New Movement Based on Old Ideas","authors":"J. Macdonald, C. Branas, R. Stokes","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvgc608k.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter traces the history of select endeavors that focused on place-based changes as a mechanism to improve the health, safety, and well-being of urban residents. Unfortunately, these endeavors evolved in silos, with urban planners and public-health and criminal-justice practitioners working largely in isolation from one another. The successes and limited uptake of these isolated endeavors are brought to light as the chapter looks at how they were overshadowed by individually focused therapies and interventions. Many people probably think that good science is already inherently involved when a place gets altered or a development gets built; this is perhaps the case with respect to the physical science of certain placemaking endeavors. However, the health and biological impacts of buildings and larger developments are very often left out, or only modestly considered as part of environmental or health-impact assessments. As such, there is a need to invigorate a new movement that connects social scientists, planners, and policy makers. Indeed, the best placemaking occurs when it is supported by empirical evaluation of its impacts on humans with the active involvement of scientists.","PeriodicalId":253299,"journal":{"name":"Changing Places","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing Places","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvgc608k.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter traces the history of select endeavors that focused on place-based changes as a mechanism to improve the health, safety, and well-being of urban residents. Unfortunately, these endeavors evolved in silos, with urban planners and public-health and criminal-justice practitioners working largely in isolation from one another. The successes and limited uptake of these isolated endeavors are brought to light as the chapter looks at how they were overshadowed by individually focused therapies and interventions. Many people probably think that good science is already inherently involved when a place gets altered or a development gets built; this is perhaps the case with respect to the physical science of certain placemaking endeavors. However, the health and biological impacts of buildings and larger developments are very often left out, or only modestly considered as part of environmental or health-impact assessments. As such, there is a need to invigorate a new movement that connects social scientists, planners, and policy makers. Indeed, the best placemaking occurs when it is supported by empirical evaluation of its impacts on humans with the active involvement of scientists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以旧思想为基础的新运动
本章追溯了一些重点关注以地方为基础的变革作为一种改善城市居民健康、安全和福祉的机制的精选努力的历史。不幸的是,这些努力是各自为政的,城市规划者、公共卫生和刑事司法从业人员在很大程度上是相互孤立的。这些孤立的努力的成功和有限的吸收被揭示出来,因为本章着眼于它们是如何被个人关注的治疗和干预所掩盖的。许多人可能认为,当一个地方被改变或开发项目被建造时,良好的科学已经内在地参与其中;这可能是关于某些场所营造努力的物理科学的情况。然而,建筑物和大型开发项目的健康和生物影响往往被忽略,或者仅仅作为环境或健康影响评估的一部分加以适度考虑。因此,有必要激发一场新的运动,将社会科学家、规划者和政策制定者联系起来。事实上,当科学家积极参与对其对人类的影响进行实证评估时,就会出现最佳的选址。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3. Establishing Evidence 5. The Nature Cure 2. A New Movement Based on Old Ideas Index 7. Good Clean Fun
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1