Sensitivity and Resistivity of Various Antibiotics Against of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Isolates

Arwa Saud Abbas, Lahraseb Khan, Hafiz Shehzad Muzammil, Muhammad Mohsin Aftab
{"title":"Sensitivity and Resistivity of Various Antibiotics Against of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Isolates","authors":"Arwa Saud Abbas, Lahraseb Khan, Hafiz Shehzad Muzammil, Muhammad Mohsin Aftab","doi":"10.54393/fbt.v1i01.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibiotics are an essential therapy for a variety of bacterial infections, but misuse and overuse of them is encouraging bacterial resistance. Objective: To check different drugs' antibacterial effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the goal. Methods: For this experiment, samples were taken from patients in the pathology division of the Fatima Memorial Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. From all of the samples gathered, 170 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were discovered. To identify bacteria, traditional culture and biochemical techniques were performed. Antibacterial activity was determined by comparing the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of all clinical isolates to commercial antibiotic discs (cefazolin, cefepime, cefixime, cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, cephalothin, amikacin, amoxycillin, ampicillin, Augmentin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, gentamycin, imipenem. Results: Imipenem (100% sensitivity), Ceftazidime (99%), Linezolid (99%), Clindamycin (99%), Gentamycin (92%), Ciprofloxacin (88%), Levofloxacin (78%), and Cefotaxime (71%), among other antibiotics, shown remarkable sensitivity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusions: We came to the conclusion that all clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa exhibited broad resistance to meropenem, ampicillin, cefuroxime, and cefepime. To reduce antibiotic resistance, technical infrastructure must be improved. Appropriate antibiotic selection and advised hand washing are two such measures.","PeriodicalId":114319,"journal":{"name":"Futuristic Biotechnology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futuristic Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/fbt.v1i01.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotics are an essential therapy for a variety of bacterial infections, but misuse and overuse of them is encouraging bacterial resistance. Objective: To check different drugs' antibacterial effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the goal. Methods: For this experiment, samples were taken from patients in the pathology division of the Fatima Memorial Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. From all of the samples gathered, 170 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were discovered. To identify bacteria, traditional culture and biochemical techniques were performed. Antibacterial activity was determined by comparing the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of all clinical isolates to commercial antibiotic discs (cefazolin, cefepime, cefixime, cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, cephalothin, amikacin, amoxycillin, ampicillin, Augmentin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, gentamycin, imipenem. Results: Imipenem (100% sensitivity), Ceftazidime (99%), Linezolid (99%), Clindamycin (99%), Gentamycin (92%), Ciprofloxacin (88%), Levofloxacin (78%), and Cefotaxime (71%), among other antibiotics, shown remarkable sensitivity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusions: We came to the conclusion that all clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa exhibited broad resistance to meropenem, ampicillin, cefuroxime, and cefepime. To reduce antibiotic resistance, technical infrastructure must be improved. Appropriate antibiotic selection and advised hand washing are two such measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同抗生素对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的敏感性及电阻率分析
抗生素是治疗多种细菌感染的基本药物,但滥用和过度使用抗生素会鼓励细菌产生耐药性。目的:考察不同药物对铜绿假单胞菌的抑菌效果。方法:本实验样本取自巴基斯坦拉合尔法蒂玛纪念医院病理科的患者。从收集的所有样本中,发现了170株铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株。采用传统培养和生化技术进行细菌鉴定。通过比较所有临床分离菌株对市售抗生素片(头孢唑林、头孢吡肟、头孢克肟、头孢西丁、头孢曲松、头孢他啶、头孢呋辛、头孢噻吩、阿米卡星、阿莫西林、氨苄西林、奥格门汀、环丙沙星、克林霉素、庆大霉素、亚胺培南)的药敏模式来测定抗菌活性。结果:亚胺培南(100%)、头孢他啶(99%)、利奈唑胺(99%)、克林霉素(99%)、庆大霉素(92%)、环丙沙星(88%)、左氧氟沙星(78%)、头孢噻肟(71%)等抗生素对铜绿假单胞菌的敏感性显著。结论:我们得出结论,所有临床分离的铜绿假单胞菌对美罗培南、氨苄西林、头孢呋辛和头孢吡肟均表现出广泛的耐药。为了减少抗生素耐药性,必须改善技术基础设施。适当选择抗生素和建议洗手就是这两项措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rhizosphere: An Ideal Site for PGPR Screening In Silico Assessment of Post Translational Modifications Caused by NRAS Gene SNPs in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Utilization of Peach Juice as Substrate for Lactobacillus casei to Develop Probiotic Beverage Effect of Anti-Hypertensive Drug Atenolol on Liver Function by Evaluating ALT levels CRISPR-Cas9: The Future of Precision Genome Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1