{"title":"The sports metaphor in American cultural discourse","authors":"J. Segrave","doi":"10.1080/14610980008721862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphor is one of the most distinctive and salient features of language. Nietzsche in fact took the metaphor so seriously that he considered it the basic principle of all language: so-called literal talk remained a sort of frozen sediment of metaphor.' Ortega y Gasset also valued the metaphor considering it, like Nietzsche, a principle component of reality: far from being the deformation of reality, it was rather its organization. As both Nietzsche and Ortega y Gasset realized, the metaphor is nuclear rather than atomistic, an intellectual device that links rather than isolates the distinctive features of everyday experiences. It is therefore through rhetorical devices like metaphor that we communicate a common set of symbols; language, communication, symbolism and communal life become inseparable and interrelated components of an identifiable cultural perspective. As a result, culture becomes encoded in metaphor. One of the sources of metaphor, and hence one of the mechanisms by which our communal reality is mediated, is the world of sport. The language of sport 'sportspeak' as Robert Lipsyte once called it has penetrated our entire national language system. R. Palmatier and H. Ray, in fact, have identified as many as 1700 commonly used sports metaphors, taken from more than 100 games and sports ranging from boxing ('catch someone off guard') to bull-fighting ('take the bull by the horns'), cricket ('shiver my timbers') to rowing ('pull your weight'), polo ('come a cropper') to wrestling ('no holds barred'). The idea of sport as a metaphor for life ('life is a game') is so common in America and American literature that it has become a part of our conventional wisdom. But as frequently as we use the sports metaphor, often unwittingly, its omnipresence must be qualified by specificity. Metaphors from particular sports predominate in particular cultural discourses. The purpose of this article is to identify and account for the sports metaphors that dominate particular cultural discourses, often noting a change over time. In my analysis, I will uncover patterns of metaphor use and in so doing I will explore the nexus of shared values and assumptions that undergird our collective way of life. The four discourses I am most concerned with are warfare, politics, business and sexual relations, those discourses that have most readily embraced the sports metaphor.","PeriodicalId":105095,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Sport, Society","volume":"452 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Sport, Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14610980008721862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44
Abstract
Metaphor is one of the most distinctive and salient features of language. Nietzsche in fact took the metaphor so seriously that he considered it the basic principle of all language: so-called literal talk remained a sort of frozen sediment of metaphor.' Ortega y Gasset also valued the metaphor considering it, like Nietzsche, a principle component of reality: far from being the deformation of reality, it was rather its organization. As both Nietzsche and Ortega y Gasset realized, the metaphor is nuclear rather than atomistic, an intellectual device that links rather than isolates the distinctive features of everyday experiences. It is therefore through rhetorical devices like metaphor that we communicate a common set of symbols; language, communication, symbolism and communal life become inseparable and interrelated components of an identifiable cultural perspective. As a result, culture becomes encoded in metaphor. One of the sources of metaphor, and hence one of the mechanisms by which our communal reality is mediated, is the world of sport. The language of sport 'sportspeak' as Robert Lipsyte once called it has penetrated our entire national language system. R. Palmatier and H. Ray, in fact, have identified as many as 1700 commonly used sports metaphors, taken from more than 100 games and sports ranging from boxing ('catch someone off guard') to bull-fighting ('take the bull by the horns'), cricket ('shiver my timbers') to rowing ('pull your weight'), polo ('come a cropper') to wrestling ('no holds barred'). The idea of sport as a metaphor for life ('life is a game') is so common in America and American literature that it has become a part of our conventional wisdom. But as frequently as we use the sports metaphor, often unwittingly, its omnipresence must be qualified by specificity. Metaphors from particular sports predominate in particular cultural discourses. The purpose of this article is to identify and account for the sports metaphors that dominate particular cultural discourses, often noting a change over time. In my analysis, I will uncover patterns of metaphor use and in so doing I will explore the nexus of shared values and assumptions that undergird our collective way of life. The four discourses I am most concerned with are warfare, politics, business and sexual relations, those discourses that have most readily embraced the sports metaphor.
隐喻是语言最鲜明、最突出的特征之一。尼采实际上非常认真地对待隐喻,他认为这是所有语言的基本原则,所谓的字面谈话,仍然是一种隐喻的冻结沉淀奥尔特加·加塞特也重视隐喻,认为它像尼采一样,是现实的主要组成部分:远非是现实的变形,而是它的组织。正如尼采和奥尔特加·加塞特(Ortega y Gasset)所认识到的那样,隐喻是核心的而不是原子的,是一种将日常经验的鲜明特征联系起来而不是孤立起来的智力手段。因此,通过隐喻等修辞手段,我们传达了一套共同的符号;语言、交流、象征和公共生活成为一个可识别的文化视角中不可分割和相互关联的组成部分。因此,文化被编码在隐喻中。隐喻的来源之一,因此也是我们共同现实的中介机制之一,就是体育世界。罗伯特·利普西特曾称体育语言为“体育语言”,这种语言已经渗透到我们整个国家的语言体系中。事实上,R. Palmatier和H. Ray已经确定了多达1700个常用的体育隐喻,这些隐喻来自100多种游戏和体育项目,从拳击(“猝不及防”)到斗牛(“抓住公牛的角”),从板球(“抖抖我的骨头”)到赛艇(“尽你所能”),从马球(“干掉一个人”)到摔跤(“毫不留情”)。把体育作为生活的隐喻(“生活是一场游戏”)的想法在美国和美国文学中是如此普遍,以至于它已经成为我们传统智慧的一部分。但是,尽管我们经常无意识地使用体育比喻,但它的无所不在必须有特殊性。来自特定体育运动的隐喻在特定文化话语中占主导地位。本文的目的是识别和解释主导特定文化话语的体育隐喻,经常注意到随着时间的变化。在我的分析中,我将揭示隐喻使用的模式,并以此探索支撑我们集体生活方式的共同价值观和假设之间的联系。我最关心的四种话语是战争、政治、商业和性关系,这些话语最容易接受体育隐喻。