Remote sensing of methane plumes: instrument tradeoff analysis for detecting and quantifying local sources at global scale

Siraput Jongaramrungruang, G. Matheou, A. Thorpe, Z. Zeng, C. Frankenberg
{"title":"Remote sensing of methane plumes: instrument tradeoff analysis for detecting and quantifying local sources at global scale","authors":"Siraput Jongaramrungruang, G. Matheou, A. Thorpe, Z. Zeng, C. Frankenberg","doi":"10.5194/AMT-2021-205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Methane (CH4) is the 2nd most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas with a significant impact on radiative forcing, tropospheric air quality and stratospheric water vapor. Remote-sensing observations enable the detection and quantification of local methane emissions across large geographical areas, which is a critical step for understanding local flux distributions and subsequently prioritizing mitigation strategies. Obtaining methane column concentration measurements with low noise and minimal surface interference has direct consequences for accurately determining the location and emission rates of methane sources. The quality of retrieved column enhancements depends on the choices of instrument and retrieval parameters. Here, we studied the changes in precision error and bias as a result of different spectral resolutions, instrument optical performance and detector exposure times by using a realistic instrument noise model. In addition, we formally analysed the impact of spectrally complex surface albedo features on retrievals using the Iterative Maximum a Posteriori- Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (IMAP-DOAS) algorithm. We built an end-to-end modelling framework that can simulate observed radiances from reflected solar irradiance through a simulated CH4 plume over several natural and man-made surfaces. Our analysis shows that complex surface features can alias into retrieved methane abundances, explaining the existence of retrieval biases in current airborne methane observations. The impact can be mitigated with higher spectral resolution and a larger polynomial degree to approximate surface albedo variations. Using a spectral resolution of 1.5 nm, an exposure time of 20 ms, and a polynomial degree of 25, a retrieval precision error below 0.007 mole m−2 or 1.0 % of total atmospheric CH4 column can be achieved for high albedo cases, while minimizing the bias due to surface interference such that the noise is uncorrelated among various surfaces. At coarser spectral resolutions, it becomes increasingly harder to separate complex surface albedo features from atmospheric absorption features. Our modelling framework provides the basis for assessing trade-offs for future remote-sensing instruments and algorithmic designs. For instance, we find that improving the spectral resolution beyond 0.2 nm would actually decrease the retrieval precision as detector readout noise will play an increasing role. Our work contributes towards building an enhanced monitoring system that can measure CH4 concentration fields to determine methane sources accurately and efficiently at scale.\n","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/AMT-2021-205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract. Methane (CH4) is the 2nd most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas with a significant impact on radiative forcing, tropospheric air quality and stratospheric water vapor. Remote-sensing observations enable the detection and quantification of local methane emissions across large geographical areas, which is a critical step for understanding local flux distributions and subsequently prioritizing mitigation strategies. Obtaining methane column concentration measurements with low noise and minimal surface interference has direct consequences for accurately determining the location and emission rates of methane sources. The quality of retrieved column enhancements depends on the choices of instrument and retrieval parameters. Here, we studied the changes in precision error and bias as a result of different spectral resolutions, instrument optical performance and detector exposure times by using a realistic instrument noise model. In addition, we formally analysed the impact of spectrally complex surface albedo features on retrievals using the Iterative Maximum a Posteriori- Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (IMAP-DOAS) algorithm. We built an end-to-end modelling framework that can simulate observed radiances from reflected solar irradiance through a simulated CH4 plume over several natural and man-made surfaces. Our analysis shows that complex surface features can alias into retrieved methane abundances, explaining the existence of retrieval biases in current airborne methane observations. The impact can be mitigated with higher spectral resolution and a larger polynomial degree to approximate surface albedo variations. Using a spectral resolution of 1.5 nm, an exposure time of 20 ms, and a polynomial degree of 25, a retrieval precision error below 0.007 mole m−2 or 1.0 % of total atmospheric CH4 column can be achieved for high albedo cases, while minimizing the bias due to surface interference such that the noise is uncorrelated among various surfaces. At coarser spectral resolutions, it becomes increasingly harder to separate complex surface albedo features from atmospheric absorption features. Our modelling framework provides the basis for assessing trade-offs for future remote-sensing instruments and algorithmic designs. For instance, we find that improving the spectral resolution beyond 0.2 nm would actually decrease the retrieval precision as detector readout noise will play an increasing role. Our work contributes towards building an enhanced monitoring system that can measure CH4 concentration fields to determine methane sources accurately and efficiently at scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲烷羽流遥感:在全球尺度上探测和量化当地来源的仪器权衡分析
摘要甲烷(CH4)是第二大人为温室气体,对辐射强迫、对流层空气质量和平流层水蒸气有重要影响。遥感观测能够探测和量化大地理区域的当地甲烷排放,这是了解当地通量分布并随后确定缓解战略优先次序的关键步骤。获得低噪声和最小表面干扰的甲烷柱浓度测量对准确确定甲烷源的位置和排放率具有直接影响。检索柱增强的质量取决于仪器和检索参数的选择。本文采用真实仪器噪声模型,研究了不同光谱分辨率、仪器光学性能和探测器曝光时间对精度误差和偏置的影响。此外,我们正式分析了光谱复杂的表面反照率特征对使用迭代最大后验差分光学吸收光谱(IMAP-DOAS)算法检索的影响。我们建立了一个端到端的建模框架,可以通过模拟的CH4羽流在几个自然和人造表面上反射的太阳辐照度来模拟观测到的辐射。我们的分析表明,复杂的地表特征可以混叠到检索到的甲烷丰度中,这解释了当前航空甲烷观测中检索偏差的存在。用更高的光谱分辨率和更大的多项式度来近似地表反照率变化可以减轻这种影响。利用1.5 nm的光谱分辨率,20 ms的曝光时间,25的多项式度,在高反照率的情况下,可以实现低于0.007 mol m−2或大气CH4总柱的1.0%的检索精度误差,同时最大限度地减少由于表面干扰造成的偏差,使各种表面之间的噪声不相关。在较粗的光谱分辨率下,将复杂的地表反照率特征与大气吸收特征分离开来变得越来越困难。我们的建模框架为评估未来遥感仪器和算法设计的权衡提供了基础。例如,我们发现提高0.2 nm以上的光谱分辨率实际上会降低检索精度,因为探测器读出噪声的作用会越来越大。我们的工作有助于建立一个增强的监测系统,可以测量CH4浓度场,以准确有效地确定甲烷来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved monitoring of shipping NO2 with TROPOMI: decreasing NOx emissions in European seas during the COVID-19 pandemic Continuous mapping of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air quality in East Asia at daily 6×6 km2 resolution by application of a random forest algorithm to 2011–2019 GOCI geostationary satellite data Fill dynamics and sample mixing in the AirCore  Relative errors of derived multi-wavelengths intensive aerosol optical properties using CAPS_SSA, Nephelometer and TAP measurements Laboratory evaluation of the scattering matrix of ragweed, ash, birch and pine pollens towards pollen classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1