{"title":"Trump, Xi and Game Theory","authors":"M.S.S. El-Namaki","doi":"10.19085/JOURNAL.SIJBPG050501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presidents Trump and Xi are approaching a game theory Nash construct. Both, predecessors included, have colluded into creating a race towards dominance of global trade, finance and technology. China by, primarily,  enhancing the consumption share of US GDP and America by feeding Chinese insatiable hunger for technology.  They created a dangerous measure of interdependence that translated into a mutually exclusive “win” situation.  The game would have continued unchallenged was it not for President Trump’s sudden realization that the probability of a win-win outcome is low. He then tampered with the underlying premises of the game and a new dynamic emerged. How will the game evolve? This will be the focus of the following article. The article applies an eclectic mix of conceptual frameworks including Game Theory, Nash equilibrium and Hofstede’ culture consequences, among others, in order to formulate a likely scenario.  It analytically places the two presidents within a Nash equilibrium prisoners’ dilemma framework with each considering his strategic moves while eying shadow moves by the other.","PeriodicalId":153381,"journal":{"name":"Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance ISSN 2394-3351","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance ISSN 2394-3351","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19085/JOURNAL.SIJBPG050501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Presidents Trump and Xi are approaching a game theory Nash construct. Both, predecessors included, have colluded into creating a race towards dominance of global trade, finance and technology. China by, primarily,  enhancing the consumption share of US GDP and America by feeding Chinese insatiable hunger for technology.  They created a dangerous measure of interdependence that translated into a mutually exclusive “win” situation.  The game would have continued unchallenged was it not for President Trump’s sudden realization that the probability of a win-win outcome is low. He then tampered with the underlying premises of the game and a new dynamic emerged. How will the game evolve? This will be the focus of the following article. The article applies an eclectic mix of conceptual frameworks including Game Theory, Nash equilibrium and Hofstede’ culture consequences, among others, in order to formulate a likely scenario.  It analytically places the two presidents within a Nash equilibrium prisoners’ dilemma framework with each considering his strategic moves while eying shadow moves by the other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特朗普总统和ξ正接近一个博弈论纳什构造。包括前任在内,这两家公司都串通一气,发起了一场争夺全球贸易、金融和技术主导地位的竞赛。中国主要是通过提高美国GDP和美国的消费份额来满足中国对技术的永不满足的渴望。它们创造了一种危险的相互依赖程度,转化为一种相互排斥的“双赢”局面。如果不是特朗普总统突然意识到双赢的可能性很低,这场游戏本可以不受挑战地继续下去。然后他修改了游戏的基本前提,出现了新的动态。游戏将如何发展?这将是下一篇文章的重点。本文采用了包括博弈论、纳什均衡和霍夫斯泰德文化后果等概念框架的折衷组合,以形成一个可能的场景。它分析地将两位总统置于纳什均衡囚犯困境框架中,每个人都考虑自己的战略行动,同时关注对方的影子行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global Ranking and Its Implications in Higher Education The Moderating Effect of Gender on Audit Committee Attributes and Earnings Management Corruption and Its Effects on Sustainable Economic Performance Digital Entrepreneurship vis-à-vis Managing Customers’ Data: Available Ways & Means to Protect the Online Presence of the Businesses Board Characteristics and Intellectual Capital Performance: A Comparison of Service vs. Manufacturing Firms in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1