Humanization of punishment. Evolution of the concept in drafts of normative legal documents of the XVIIIth and early XIXth centuries in Russia

Maksim Vladimirovich Smoljarov
{"title":"Humanization of punishment. Evolution of the concept in drafts of normative legal documents of the XVIIIth and early XIXth centuries in Russia","authors":"Maksim Vladimirovich Smoljarov","doi":"10.14420/EN.2014.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses how ideas concerning punishment fulfillment were developing in legislative proposals of normative legal documents of the XVIIIth and early XIXth centuries. The author emphasises the fact that despite the declared humanism, all legislative proposals under examination still considered death penalty as the principal punishment. Nevertheless some modification of the capital punishment did take place: whereas early in the XVIIIth century there were specified two formats of death penalty (ordinary and qualified), the Draft of the Criminal Code of 1813 lists only an ordinary death penalty. Analysis of historic processes and punishment conceptions that are set forth in legislative proposals of the XVIIIth and early XIXth centuries allowed the author to predict further development of domestic legislation in the field of penal sanctions.","PeriodicalId":158859,"journal":{"name":"Law and modern states","volume":"332 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and modern states","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14420/EN.2014.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyses how ideas concerning punishment fulfillment were developing in legislative proposals of normative legal documents of the XVIIIth and early XIXth centuries. The author emphasises the fact that despite the declared humanism, all legislative proposals under examination still considered death penalty as the principal punishment. Nevertheless some modification of the capital punishment did take place: whereas early in the XVIIIth century there were specified two formats of death penalty (ordinary and qualified), the Draft of the Criminal Code of 1813 lists only an ordinary death penalty. Analysis of historic processes and punishment conceptions that are set forth in legislative proposals of the XVIIIth and early XIXth centuries allowed the author to predict further development of domestic legislation in the field of penal sanctions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
惩罚的人性化。18世纪和19世纪初俄罗斯规范性法律文件草案中概念的演变
本文分析了18世纪和19世纪早期的规范性法律文件的立法建议中关于刑罚履行的观念是如何发展的。提交人强调,尽管宣布了人道主义,但正在审查的所有立法建议仍将死刑视为主要刑罚。尽管如此,对死刑确实进行了一些修改:在十八世纪早期,有两种具体的死刑形式(普通和限定),1813年《刑法草案》只列出了一种普通死刑。通过对十八世纪和十九世纪初立法提案中提出的历史进程和刑罚概念的分析,作者可以预测国内立法在刑事制裁领域的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Международно-правовая оценка противодействия коррупции Исторический очерк российских систематизаций законодательства в форме Свода законов ТРУДНОСТИ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ ПРАВОВОЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ Проблематика международно-правовой ответственности в российской и зарубежной доктрине международного права НОВЫЕ ПРИЕМЫ ЮРИДИЧЕСКОЙ ТЕХНИКИ: ВРЕМЕННЫЕ НОРМЫ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1