{"title":"Promoting recovery in England","authors":"P. Triantafillou, Naja Vucina","doi":"10.7765/9781526130846.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the political rationalities, expertise, and techniques of government involved in the emergence of mental recovery in England as a field of more or – very often – less systematic political intervention. Like in many other liberal democracies, the treatment of the mentally ill in England has undergone a substantial transformation from an approach in which relatively narrow biomedical interventions were employed in large-scale mental institutions to so-called community-based care. Our overall argument in this chapter is that recovery is a power-laden practice that works above all through nurturing and structuring the self-steering capacities – the freedom – of the mentally ill. While we strongly sympathise with those that celebrate the emancipatory potential of the de-institutionalisation of the treatment of mental illness, we are also concerned with the new kind of power engrained in the recovery approach.","PeriodicalId":337754,"journal":{"name":"The politics of health promotion","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The politics of health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130846.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter examines the political rationalities, expertise, and techniques of government involved in the emergence of mental recovery in England as a field of more or – very often – less systematic political intervention. Like in many other liberal democracies, the treatment of the mentally ill in England has undergone a substantial transformation from an approach in which relatively narrow biomedical interventions were employed in large-scale mental institutions to so-called community-based care. Our overall argument in this chapter is that recovery is a power-laden practice that works above all through nurturing and structuring the self-steering capacities – the freedom – of the mentally ill. While we strongly sympathise with those that celebrate the emancipatory potential of the de-institutionalisation of the treatment of mental illness, we are also concerned with the new kind of power engrained in the recovery approach.