Student Perceptions about Online Collaborative Coursework

Tracia M. Forman, Ava S. Miller
{"title":"Student Perceptions about Online Collaborative Coursework","authors":"Tracia M. Forman, Ava S. Miller","doi":"10.5430/jct.v12n3p224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Collaborative coursework may improve student engagement but is often viewed as problematic by both students and faculty, particularly in the online classroom. The aim of this research is to present results of a retrospective, qualitative content analysis of student related perceptions about group work in the online classroom. Methods: Data analysis was completed with the use of qualitative content analysis (QCA), a valid research method for describing the meaning of qualitative data in a systematic way. QCA was used to inform the following research question: What perceptions do students have about working with a group in the online classroom? Data were collected through a retrospective analysis of student responses posted to discussion board forums. Responses of students (N = 192) enrolled in three different courses, over two semesters were analyzed by a team of two researchers. Results: Findings included student reflections about group work being a stressful, negative experience, with the asynchronous environment of the online classroom increasing student anxiety about group work. Students reported different academic goals and lack of participation among group members as common issues. In addition, students reported concern with group management or organization and the fairness of group work grading practices. Conclusions: These results inform a discussion of best practices, skills and technology faculty can use to transform online group work into a positive learning experience for all students. Online education needs to be meaningful and responsive to meet students’ needs. Research has shown group work can improve student engagement and facilitate accomplishment; however, the negotiation of group work processes can be stressful for students and faculty, particularly in the online classroom.","PeriodicalId":198854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n3p224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Collaborative coursework may improve student engagement but is often viewed as problematic by both students and faculty, particularly in the online classroom. The aim of this research is to present results of a retrospective, qualitative content analysis of student related perceptions about group work in the online classroom. Methods: Data analysis was completed with the use of qualitative content analysis (QCA), a valid research method for describing the meaning of qualitative data in a systematic way. QCA was used to inform the following research question: What perceptions do students have about working with a group in the online classroom? Data were collected through a retrospective analysis of student responses posted to discussion board forums. Responses of students (N = 192) enrolled in three different courses, over two semesters were analyzed by a team of two researchers. Results: Findings included student reflections about group work being a stressful, negative experience, with the asynchronous environment of the online classroom increasing student anxiety about group work. Students reported different academic goals and lack of participation among group members as common issues. In addition, students reported concern with group management or organization and the fairness of group work grading practices. Conclusions: These results inform a discussion of best practices, skills and technology faculty can use to transform online group work into a positive learning experience for all students. Online education needs to be meaningful and responsive to meet students’ needs. Research has shown group work can improve student engagement and facilitate accomplishment; however, the negotiation of group work processes can be stressful for students and faculty, particularly in the online classroom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对在线合作课程的看法
目的:协作课程可以提高学生的参与度,但通常被学生和教师视为问题,特别是在在线课堂中。本研究的目的是对在线课堂中学生对小组作业的相关看法进行回顾性定性内容分析。方法:采用定性内容分析法(QCA)完成数据分析,QCA是一种系统描述定性数据含义的有效研究方法。QCA被用来告知以下研究问题:学生对在线课堂上的小组合作有什么看法?数据是通过对学生在论坛上发表的回复进行回顾性分析来收集的。两名研究人员在两个学期内对参加了三门不同课程的192名学生的回答进行了分析。结果:调查结果包括学生认为小组作业是一种有压力的消极体验,在线课堂的异步环境增加了学生对小组作业的焦虑。学生们报告说,不同的学术目标和小组成员之间缺乏参与是常见的问题。此外,学生们报告了对小组管理或组织以及小组作业评分实践公平性的担忧。结论:这些结果为最佳实践、技能和技术的讨论提供了信息,教师可以使用这些方法将在线小组工作转变为所有学生的积极学习体验。在线教育必须是有意义的,并能满足学生的需求。研究表明,小组合作可以提高学生的参与度,促进他们的成就;然而,小组工作过程的协商可能会给学生和教师带来压力,尤其是在在线课堂上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methods of Studying Web Technologies in a Blended Learning Format: Analysis of Models in Education Google’s Digital Tools for Education: A Selection of Tools Development of Students' Artistic Self-Identification: Finding Their Own Style Modern Trends in Teaching Artistic Techniques and Methods: Analysis of Approaches to the Development of Artists Efficiency of Arts Education in the Context of Formation of Intercultural Communication Skills: Case-Study and Statistical Analysis of the Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1