Cost drivers of software corrective maintenance: An empirical study in two companies

Jingyue Li, T. Stålhane, Jan M. W. Kristiansen, R. Conradi
{"title":"Cost drivers of software corrective maintenance: An empirical study in two companies","authors":"Jingyue Li, T. Stålhane, Jan M. W. Kristiansen, R. Conradi","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2010.5609538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To estimate the corrective software maintenance effort, we must know the factors that have the strongest influence on corrective maintenance activities. In this study, we have analyzed activities and effort of correcting 810 software defects in one Norwegian software company and 577 software defects in another. We compared the defect profiles according to the defect correction effort. We also analyzed defect descriptions and recorded discussions between developers in the course of correcting defects in order to understand what led to the high cost of correcting some types of defects. The study shows that size and complexity of the software to be maintained, maintainers?' experience, and tool and process support are the most influential cost drivers of corrective maintenance in one company, while domain knowledge is one of the main cost drivers of corrective maintenance in the other company. This illustrates that models for estimating software corrective maintenance effort have to be customized based on the defect profiles and cost drivers of each company and project to be useful.","PeriodicalId":101801,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2010.5609538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

To estimate the corrective software maintenance effort, we must know the factors that have the strongest influence on corrective maintenance activities. In this study, we have analyzed activities and effort of correcting 810 software defects in one Norwegian software company and 577 software defects in another. We compared the defect profiles according to the defect correction effort. We also analyzed defect descriptions and recorded discussions between developers in the course of correcting defects in order to understand what led to the high cost of correcting some types of defects. The study shows that size and complexity of the software to be maintained, maintainers?' experience, and tool and process support are the most influential cost drivers of corrective maintenance in one company, while domain knowledge is one of the main cost drivers of corrective maintenance in the other company. This illustrates that models for estimating software corrective maintenance effort have to be customized based on the defect profiles and cost drivers of each company and project to be useful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件纠正性维护的成本动因:两家公司的实证研究
为了估计纠正性软件维护工作,我们必须知道对纠正性维护活动有最大影响的因素。在这项研究中,我们分析了一个挪威软件公司纠正810个软件缺陷和另一个挪威软件公司纠正577个软件缺陷的活动和努力。我们根据缺陷纠正工作比较了缺陷概况。我们还分析了缺陷描述,并记录了在纠正缺陷过程中开发人员之间的讨论,以便了解是什么导致了纠正某些类型缺陷的高成本。研究表明,软件的规模和复杂性需要维护,维护人员?在一家公司,经验、工具和工艺支持是最具影响力的成本驱动因素,而在另一家公司,领域知识是主要的成本驱动因素之一。这说明估算软件纠正维护工作的模型必须根据每个公司和项目的缺陷概要和成本驱动因素进行定制,这样才有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conversion of fast inter-procedural static analysis to model checking Using Relational Topic Models to capture coupling among classes in object-oriented software systems Theil index for aggregation of software metrics values An approach to improving software inspections performance Automatically repairing test cases for evolving method declarations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1