Results of head and neck burn reconstructive plastic surgery

A. A. Kayumkhodjaev, Mukhabbat Khalmuratova
{"title":"Results of head and neck burn reconstructive plastic surgery","authors":"A. A. Kayumkhodjaev, Mukhabbat Khalmuratova","doi":"10.51145/jlsb.2021.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The present research aimed to analyze the results of all reconstruction types (microsurgical and axial flaps) in head and neck post-burn cicatricial defects. Methods. The study included 114 patients who underwent flaps autotransplantation with microvascular anastomoses, options for plasty with axial flaps on a preserved (natural) vascular pedicle, plasty with displaced flaps, and free skin plasty for the period from 1995 to 2021. According to the formed groups for comparative analysis, all patients were divided into a comparison group included of 51 patients (1995-2008 year) and the main group with 63 patients (2009-2021 year). Women predominated with 55.6% and 58.8% in the main and comparison groups, respectively. Medium defects (50-120 cm²) of the upper face and neck area prevailed in equal numbers (11.8%). Most of the patients had a median-lateral unilateral post-burn cicatricial deformity. In terms of functional impairments, grade I up to an angle of 90º and degree II up to an angle of 45º was prevailed. Results. The consolidated long-term results of plastic surgery in the functional value were good in the main group in 69.9% of cases, while in the comparison group it was in 47.1%. The aesthetic indicators of the consolidated long-term results of plastic surgery were good in 57.5% of cases of the main group and significantly was lower in the comparison group (33.3% of cases). Unsatisfactory results were observed in 1.4% of cases in the main group and 17.6% in the comparison group. Conclusion. Improvement in head and neck burn reconstructive plastic surgery with various variants of axial flaps made it possible to increase the proportion of uncomplicated postoperative course, shorten the hospital stay and the total duration of all stages of plasty, and, in general, ensured a decrease in the frequency of unsatisfactory functional and aesthetic results.","PeriodicalId":113264,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51145/jlsb.2021.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The present research aimed to analyze the results of all reconstruction types (microsurgical and axial flaps) in head and neck post-burn cicatricial defects. Methods. The study included 114 patients who underwent flaps autotransplantation with microvascular anastomoses, options for plasty with axial flaps on a preserved (natural) vascular pedicle, plasty with displaced flaps, and free skin plasty for the period from 1995 to 2021. According to the formed groups for comparative analysis, all patients were divided into a comparison group included of 51 patients (1995-2008 year) and the main group with 63 patients (2009-2021 year). Women predominated with 55.6% and 58.8% in the main and comparison groups, respectively. Medium defects (50-120 cm²) of the upper face and neck area prevailed in equal numbers (11.8%). Most of the patients had a median-lateral unilateral post-burn cicatricial deformity. In terms of functional impairments, grade I up to an angle of 90º and degree II up to an angle of 45º was prevailed. Results. The consolidated long-term results of plastic surgery in the functional value were good in the main group in 69.9% of cases, while in the comparison group it was in 47.1%. The aesthetic indicators of the consolidated long-term results of plastic surgery were good in 57.5% of cases of the main group and significantly was lower in the comparison group (33.3% of cases). Unsatisfactory results were observed in 1.4% of cases in the main group and 17.6% in the comparison group. Conclusion. Improvement in head and neck burn reconstructive plastic surgery with various variants of axial flaps made it possible to increase the proportion of uncomplicated postoperative course, shorten the hospital stay and the total duration of all stages of plasty, and, in general, ensured a decrease in the frequency of unsatisfactory functional and aesthetic results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头颈部烧伤重建整形手术的效果
的目标。本研究旨在分析各种类型(显微外科皮瓣和轴向皮瓣)重建头颈部烧伤后瘢痕缺损的效果。方法。该研究包括114名患者,他们在1995年至2021年期间接受了微血管吻合术的自体皮瓣移植,保留(天然)血管蒂的轴向皮瓣成形术,移位皮瓣成形术和游离皮肤成形术。根据形成的分组进行比较分析,将所有患者分为对照组51例(1995-2008年)和主组63例(2009-2021年)。在主组和对照组中,女性占主导地位,分别为55.6%和58.8%。上面部和颈部的中度缺损(50-120 cm²)占同等比例(11.8%)。大多数患者有中外侧单侧烧伤后瘢痕畸形。在功能损伤方面,以90º以下的I级和45º以下的II级为主。结果。整形手术的巩固长期的结果在功能价值是好的在主群在69.9%的情况下,而在对照组是47.1%。主组患者综合远期效果美学指标良好的占57.5%,而对照组患者美学指标明显低于主组(33.3%)。治疗结果不满意的主组为1.4%,对照组为17.6%。结论。使用各种轴向皮瓣的头颈部烧伤重建整形手术的改进,可以增加简单的术后过程的比例,缩短住院时间和所有整形阶段的总持续时间,并且总的来说,确保减少功能和美学结果不满意的频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the diets and food security of households hosting and not hosting internally displaced persons in the Kora, Burkina Faso Food consumption and dietary diversity associated with breastfeeding mod of children aged 6-23 months in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso Survival rates and quality of life of patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair Outcomes of pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to intensive care unit in Uzbekistan The quality of life of lumbar compression radiculopathy patients under microsurgical treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1