Advertised Versus Unexpected Next Purchase Coupons: Consumer Satisfaction, Perceptions of Value, and Fairness

Patrali Chatterjee
{"title":"Advertised Versus Unexpected Next Purchase Coupons: Consumer Satisfaction, Perceptions of Value, and Fairness","authors":"Patrali Chatterjee","doi":"10.1108/10610420710731160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The research investigates how consumers differ in their interpretation of advertised and “surprise” (or unexpected) next-purchase coupons as delayed rewards or immediate losses based on promotion context and coupon start date restrictions.Design/methodology/approach – Two laboratory experiments examine how consumers respond to next-purchase coupons. In Study 1, next-purchase coupon types (advertised; unexpected) vs. competing brand promotions (yes; no) vs. coupon start date restriction (unrestricted; restricted to future start date) between-subjects experimental design was used to examine the impact on purchase satisfaction, perceived promotion value, and perceived retailer fairness. In Study 2, four between-subjects factors were used to examine the impact on purchase satisfaction, perceived value, and retailer fairness: next-purchase coupon type vs. coupon start date restriction vs. coupon target restriction (brand-specific; non brand-specific) and the measured need-for-cognition variable (high; low).Findings – Study 1 indicates that unexpected next-purchase coupons lead to higher purchase satisfaction but lower perceptions of retailer fairness compared to advertised coupons. Study 2 indicates that consumer predisposition toward effortful thought (NFC) amplifies the impact of unrestricted start date on perceptions of retailer unfairness. Furthermore, this effect is stronger on purchase satisfaction and perceived value for unrestricted unexpected next-purchase coupons.Research limitations/implications – Results imply that advertised and unexpected next-purchase coupons differ in their impact on post-purchase outcomes of consumers. Differences in competing brand promotions and coupon start date restrictions lead to interpretations of next-purchase coupons as immediate loss vs. delayed gains.Practical implications – Managerial implications for the design and use of next-purchase promotions are discussed.Originality/value – The research paper is the first one to study how consumers respond to checkout or next-purchase coupons.","PeriodicalId":226716,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Promotion/Advertising Strategies (Sub-Topic)","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Promotion/Advertising Strategies (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420710731160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Purpose – The research investigates how consumers differ in their interpretation of advertised and “surprise” (or unexpected) next-purchase coupons as delayed rewards or immediate losses based on promotion context and coupon start date restrictions.Design/methodology/approach – Two laboratory experiments examine how consumers respond to next-purchase coupons. In Study 1, next-purchase coupon types (advertised; unexpected) vs. competing brand promotions (yes; no) vs. coupon start date restriction (unrestricted; restricted to future start date) between-subjects experimental design was used to examine the impact on purchase satisfaction, perceived promotion value, and perceived retailer fairness. In Study 2, four between-subjects factors were used to examine the impact on purchase satisfaction, perceived value, and retailer fairness: next-purchase coupon type vs. coupon start date restriction vs. coupon target restriction (brand-specific; non brand-specific) and the measured need-for-cognition variable (high; low).Findings – Study 1 indicates that unexpected next-purchase coupons lead to higher purchase satisfaction but lower perceptions of retailer fairness compared to advertised coupons. Study 2 indicates that consumer predisposition toward effortful thought (NFC) amplifies the impact of unrestricted start date on perceptions of retailer unfairness. Furthermore, this effect is stronger on purchase satisfaction and perceived value for unrestricted unexpected next-purchase coupons.Research limitations/implications – Results imply that advertised and unexpected next-purchase coupons differ in their impact on post-purchase outcomes of consumers. Differences in competing brand promotions and coupon start date restrictions lead to interpretations of next-purchase coupons as immediate loss vs. delayed gains.Practical implications – Managerial implications for the design and use of next-purchase promotions are discussed.Originality/value – The research paper is the first one to study how consumers respond to checkout or next-purchase coupons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
广告与意外的下次购买优惠券:消费者满意度,价值观念和公平性
目的:该研究调查了消费者对广告和“惊喜”(或意外)下次购买优惠券的不同理解,根据促销背景和优惠券开始日期限制,这些优惠券是延迟奖励还是立即损失。设计/方法/方法——两个实验室实验研究了消费者对下次购买优惠券的反应。在研究1中,下次购买优惠券类型(广告);意想不到的)vs.竞争品牌促销(是的;没有)vs.优惠券开始日期限制(无限制;以未来开始日期为限),采用受试者间实验设计来检验对购买满意度、感知促销价值和感知零售商公平的影响。在研究2中,使用四个受试者间因素来检验对购买满意度、感知价值和零售商公平的影响:下一次购买优惠券类型与优惠券开始日期限制与优惠券目标限制(品牌特定;非品牌特异性)和测量的认知需求变量(高;低)。研究结果-研究1表明,与广告中的优惠券相比,意想不到的下一次购买优惠券导致更高的购买满意度,但降低了对零售商公平的看法。研究2表明,消费者倾向于努力思维(NFC)放大了无限制的开始日期对零售商不公平感知的影响。此外,对于不受限制的意外下一次购买优惠券,这种影响在购买满意度和感知价值上更强。研究局限性/启示-结果表明,广告和意外的下次购买优惠券对消费者购买后结果的影响是不同的。竞争品牌促销和优惠券开始日期限制的差异导致下次购买优惠券的解释是立即损失和延迟收益。实际意义-管理意义的设计和使用的下一次购买的促销活动进行了讨论。原创性/价值——这篇研究论文是第一篇研究消费者对结帐或下次购买优惠券的反应的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive Validity of Evidence-Based Persuasion Principles: An Application of the Index Method Exclusive Display in Sponsored Search Advertising Promotion Activities in Small Businesses: Empirical Evidence from Macedonia On Brands and Word-of-Mouth The Role of Attachment in Building Consumer-Brand Relationships: An Empirical Investigation in Utilitarian Consumption Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1