Introduction: Special Issue ‘Complexity and Truth’

P. Altmann, R. Peters
{"title":"Introduction: Special Issue ‘Complexity and Truth’","authors":"P. Altmann, R. Peters","doi":"10.26754/OJS_JOS/JOS.201823286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If not even earlier, then at the latest when Oxford Dictionaries selected ‘post-truth’ as Word of the Year 2016, did the global public become aware that ‘truth’ is not an uncontested and finite concept but a social construct. Are we, then, standing on the threshold of a new ‘post-truth age’ as – for instance – The Independent has claimed? (Norman 2016) Certainly, the Word of the Year 2016 has cast a bright light onto the case that there is not ‘one truth only’ but that there are facts that can be interpreted – or rejected – in different ways. This means that truth is ‘produced’, but is it produced as scientific or religious truth or as political truth? Just think of `fake news´ and its strategic use in influencing elections, as in the case of the latest presidential elections in the US or Brazil, or the leave campaign in the case of the Brexit referendum. Thus, the production of truth is undertaken by society, at least on the level of concrete actions. This situation becomes more complicated if we consider modern complex society. The increasing globalization of economies and societies has made the world more complex than it has ever before been.","PeriodicalId":130009,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociocybernetics","volume":"242 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociocybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26754/OJS_JOS/JOS.201823286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

If not even earlier, then at the latest when Oxford Dictionaries selected ‘post-truth’ as Word of the Year 2016, did the global public become aware that ‘truth’ is not an uncontested and finite concept but a social construct. Are we, then, standing on the threshold of a new ‘post-truth age’ as – for instance – The Independent has claimed? (Norman 2016) Certainly, the Word of the Year 2016 has cast a bright light onto the case that there is not ‘one truth only’ but that there are facts that can be interpreted – or rejected – in different ways. This means that truth is ‘produced’, but is it produced as scientific or religious truth or as political truth? Just think of `fake news´ and its strategic use in influencing elections, as in the case of the latest presidential elections in the US or Brazil, or the leave campaign in the case of the Brexit referendum. Thus, the production of truth is undertaken by society, at least on the level of concrete actions. This situation becomes more complicated if we consider modern complex society. The increasing globalization of economies and societies has made the world more complex than it has ever before been.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导言:特刊《复杂性与真理》
如果不是更早,那么当《牛津词典》将“后真相”选为2016年年度词汇时,全球公众才意识到“真相”不是一个没有争议和有限的概念,而是一种社会建构。那么,我们是否正站在一个新的“后真相时代”的门槛上,就像《独立报》所说的那样?(Norman 2016)当然,2016年的年度词汇让人们认识到,事实并非“只有一个真相”,而是可以用不同的方式解释或拒绝的事实。这意味着真理是“生产”出来的,但它是作为科学或宗教真理还是作为政治真理生产出来的呢?想想“假新闻”及其在影响选举中的战略用途,比如最近美国或巴西的总统选举,或者英国脱欧公投中的脱欧运动。因此,真理的生产是由社会承担的,至少在具体行动的层面上是这样。如果我们考虑到现代复杂社会,这种情况就会变得更加复杂。经济和社会的日益全球化使世界比以往任何时候都更加复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Touristic Development in Rural Areas Algorithmic Differentiation of Society – a Luhmann Perspective on the Societal Impact of Digital Media Questioning the algorithmic transparency of location-based platforms Dividing by Zero. Tautology and Paradox in the Self-Descriptions of Anonymous Second-Order Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1