“One Belt, One Road” vs. “Free and Open Indo-Pacific”: rivalry for regional integration (views from India and Japan)

Anastasia A. Zabella, Margarita Fiveyskaya, Ekaterina Penkova
{"title":"“One Belt, One Road” vs. “Free and Open Indo-Pacific”: rivalry for regional integration (views from India and Japan)","authors":"Anastasia A. Zabella, Margarita Fiveyskaya, Ekaterina Penkova","doi":"10.31696/2072-8271-2021-4-4-53-005-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Southeast Asia is central both in terms of geopolitics and the rivalry between the two megaprojects, focused on sinocentric and japanese(american)centric globalization. In terms of global and regional leadership, the region is becoming a competitive area for \"control\" of the strategic landscape between the PRC and the USA. The article is devoted to the regionalization processes through the prism of the theory of the formation of mega-regional blocs. The purpose of the article is to analyze the approaches of Japan, India and the USA to the formation of mega-partnerships in Southeast Asia, as well as to identify the main competitive advantages of the studied initiatives for the Southeast Asian countries.","PeriodicalId":298206,"journal":{"name":"South East Asia Actual problems of Development","volume":"732 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South East Asia Actual problems of Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2072-8271-2021-4-4-53-005-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Southeast Asia is central both in terms of geopolitics and the rivalry between the two megaprojects, focused on sinocentric and japanese(american)centric globalization. In terms of global and regional leadership, the region is becoming a competitive area for "control" of the strategic landscape between the PRC and the USA. The article is devoted to the regionalization processes through the prism of the theory of the formation of mega-regional blocs. The purpose of the article is to analyze the approaches of Japan, India and the USA to the formation of mega-partnerships in Southeast Asia, as well as to identify the main competitive advantages of the studied initiatives for the Southeast Asian countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一带一路”与“自由开放的印度洋-太平洋”:区域一体化的竞争(来自印度和日本的观点)
东南亚在地缘政治和两个大项目之间的竞争方面都处于中心地位,主要集中在以中国为中心和以日本(美国)为中心的全球化。就全球和地区领导地位而言,该地区正在成为中国和美国之间“控制”战略格局的竞争地区。本文致力于通过巨型区域集团形成理论的棱镜来研究区域化进程。本文的目的是分析日本、印度和美国在东南亚形成大型伙伴关系的方法,并确定所研究的举措对东南亚国家的主要竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dead ends in Vietnam-US relations The Indo-Pacific Construct: Implications for Australia Russia-ASEAN Cooperation in the Context of the Greater Eurasian Partnership Creation New Military Bloc – New Threats to Peace and Security in Asia "Welfare State" in Australia according to Gough Whitlam's Labor Government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1