A Novel Design Approach for Post-Reentry Impact Survivability of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator Fuel

C. Barklay, R. Hoffman, G. Pohl, Benjamin Williams
{"title":"A Novel Design Approach for Post-Reentry Impact Survivability of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator Fuel","authors":"C. Barklay, R. Hoffman, G. Pohl, Benjamin Williams","doi":"10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1964, a U.S. Navy Transit navigation satellite powered by a SNAP-9A Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG) failed to achieve orbit, which resulted in the reentry and burnup of the RTG in the upper atmosphere. The subsequent atmospheric dispersion of the RTG's radioactive fuel was consistent with the RTG design philosophy of the time. However, the resulting global fallout and geographical distribution of the radioactive fuel led to a change in RTG design philosophy to complete fuel containment during all accident scenarios. This philosophy change necessitated a “free release” design architecture for the radioactive fuel encapsulations from the RTG during reentry, the survival of the individual encapsulations to the thermal pulse of reentry, and maintaining their integrity upon earth impact. All subsequent RTG designs for space applications have undergone rigorous analysis and testing to ensure conformity to these requirements. However, a “free release” design architecture becomes unviable if the mass of the individual encapsulations and their reentry aeroshell assemblies, coupled with their respective drag coefficients, results in a terminal velocity at Earth impact that potentially compromises the containment boundary of the radioactive fuel. These limiting boundary conditions necessitate consideration of potential alternative design approaches. One such approach is a “controlled reentry” design architecture for the RTG and its heat source assembly. This design approach includes an integral high-drag heat shield assembly capable of absorbing significant energy during Earth impact. Discussed are concept details, risks, trades, and a path forward.","PeriodicalId":344285,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1964, a U.S. Navy Transit navigation satellite powered by a SNAP-9A Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG) failed to achieve orbit, which resulted in the reentry and burnup of the RTG in the upper atmosphere. The subsequent atmospheric dispersion of the RTG's radioactive fuel was consistent with the RTG design philosophy of the time. However, the resulting global fallout and geographical distribution of the radioactive fuel led to a change in RTG design philosophy to complete fuel containment during all accident scenarios. This philosophy change necessitated a “free release” design architecture for the radioactive fuel encapsulations from the RTG during reentry, the survival of the individual encapsulations to the thermal pulse of reentry, and maintaining their integrity upon earth impact. All subsequent RTG designs for space applications have undergone rigorous analysis and testing to ensure conformity to these requirements. However, a “free release” design architecture becomes unviable if the mass of the individual encapsulations and their reentry aeroshell assemblies, coupled with their respective drag coefficients, results in a terminal velocity at Earth impact that potentially compromises the containment boundary of the radioactive fuel. These limiting boundary conditions necessitate consideration of potential alternative design approaches. One such approach is a “controlled reentry” design architecture for the RTG and its heat source assembly. This design approach includes an integral high-drag heat shield assembly capable of absorbing significant energy during Earth impact. Discussed are concept details, risks, trades, and a path forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射性同位素热电发电机燃料再入后撞击生存能力的新设计方法
1964年,一颗由SNAP-9A放射性同位素热电发生器(RTG)驱动的美国海军过境导航卫星未能进入轨道,导致RTG在高层大气中再入和燃烧。随后RTG的放射性燃料在大气中的扩散与当时RTG的设计理念是一致的。然而,放射性燃料的全球沉降和地理分布导致了RTG设计理念的改变,以在所有事故情况下完成燃料密封。这种理念的改变需要一个“自由释放”的设计架构,用于再入时RTG的放射性燃料封装,单个封装在再入时的热脉冲中的生存,以及在地球撞击时保持它们的完整性。随后所有用于空间应用的RTG设计都经过了严格的分析和测试,以确保符合这些要求。然而,如果单个封装及其再入气壳组件的质量,加上各自的阻力系数,导致撞击地球时的终端速度可能危及放射性燃料的安全壳边界,那么“自由释放”设计架构就不可行了。这些限制边界条件需要考虑潜在的替代设计方法。其中一种方法是RTG及其热源组件的“受控再入”设计架构。这种设计方法包括一个集成的高阻力隔热板组件,能够在地球撞击期间吸收大量能量。讨论了概念细节、风险、交易和前进的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Mission for Education and Multimedia Engagement: Breaking the Barriers to Satellite Education TID Testing of COTS-based, Two-Phase, Point-of-Load Converters for Aerospace Applications Point-Source Target Detection and Localization in Single-Frame Infrared Imagery Comparative Analysis of Different Profiles of Riblets on an Airfoil using Large Eddy Simulations A Receiver-Independent GNSS Smart Antenna for Simultaneous Jamming and Spoofing Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1