Improved rainfall frequency analysis through separation of storm intensity and storm arrival frequency

D. O’Shea, R. Nathan, Ashish Sharma, C. Wasko
{"title":"Improved rainfall frequency analysis through separation of storm intensity and storm arrival frequency","authors":"D. O’Shea, R. Nathan, Ashish Sharma, C. Wasko","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.oshea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Accurate estimation of Annual Exceedance Probabilities (AEPs) of extreme rainfalls through rainfall frequency analysis (RFA) is a critical step in the production of intensity-frequency duration relationships, which are used to inform engineering design for flood mitigation and disaster response. The most common approach to rainfall frequency analysis used in both academic literature and industry practice is to fit the three parameter Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) distribution to a series of annual maximum (AMS) rainfalls. Motivated by empirical evidence that rainfall AMS in the United States (Karlovits & Schaefer, 2020) and Australia (Nathan et al., 2016) are not well represented by the GEV distribution we explore fitting the more flexible four-parameter Kappa distribution. Use of the Kappa distribution in hydrology has been largely limited to regional studies that pool data from many sites owing to the data requirements of fitting the Kappa’s two shape parameters. As an alternative we present a two-step approach for fitting the Kappa distribution to peaks-over-threshold (POT) series based on maximum likelihood estimation. The approach separately models storm intensity and the arrival frequency. First, a Generalized Pareto distribution describing storm intensity is fitted, followed by a Binomial distribution for storm arrivals. We compare the performance of this two-step Kappa approach to an analogous two-step GEV approach, and to Kappa and GEV distributions fitted to AMS, using both synthetic and real-world data representative of Australian climatic conditions. Our results show that the two-step Kappa approach performs better than the GEV distribution at estimating extreme rainfall quantiles over a wide range of parent distributions (O’Shea et al., 2023).","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.oshea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Accurate estimation of Annual Exceedance Probabilities (AEPs) of extreme rainfalls through rainfall frequency analysis (RFA) is a critical step in the production of intensity-frequency duration relationships, which are used to inform engineering design for flood mitigation and disaster response. The most common approach to rainfall frequency analysis used in both academic literature and industry practice is to fit the three parameter Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) distribution to a series of annual maximum (AMS) rainfalls. Motivated by empirical evidence that rainfall AMS in the United States (Karlovits & Schaefer, 2020) and Australia (Nathan et al., 2016) are not well represented by the GEV distribution we explore fitting the more flexible four-parameter Kappa distribution. Use of the Kappa distribution in hydrology has been largely limited to regional studies that pool data from many sites owing to the data requirements of fitting the Kappa’s two shape parameters. As an alternative we present a two-step approach for fitting the Kappa distribution to peaks-over-threshold (POT) series based on maximum likelihood estimation. The approach separately models storm intensity and the arrival frequency. First, a Generalized Pareto distribution describing storm intensity is fitted, followed by a Binomial distribution for storm arrivals. We compare the performance of this two-step Kappa approach to an analogous two-step GEV approach, and to Kappa and GEV distributions fitted to AMS, using both synthetic and real-world data representative of Australian climatic conditions. Our results show that the two-step Kappa approach performs better than the GEV distribution at estimating extreme rainfall quantiles over a wide range of parent distributions (O’Shea et al., 2023).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过分离风暴强度和风暴到达频率,改进了降雨频率分析
通过降雨频率分析(RFA)准确估计极端降雨的年超过概率(AEPs)是产生强度-频率持续时间关系的关键步骤,该关系用于通知工程设计以减轻洪水和灾害响应。在学术文献和工业实践中,最常用的降雨频率分析方法是将三参数广义极值(GEV)分布拟合到一系列年最大降雨量(AMS)。经验证据表明,美国(Karlovits & Schaefer, 2020)和澳大利亚(Nathan et al., 2016)的降雨量AMS不能很好地代表GEV分布,因此我们探索拟合更灵活的四参数Kappa分布。由于拟合Kappa的两个形状参数的数据要求,Kappa分布在水文学中的使用在很大程度上局限于从许多地点汇集数据的区域研究。作为一种替代方法,我们提出了一种基于极大似然估计的Kappa分布拟合到超过阈值的峰值(POT)序列的两步方法。该方法分别模拟了风暴强度和到达频率。首先拟合描述风暴强度的广义帕累托分布,然后拟合风暴到达的二项分布。我们将这种两步Kappa方法的性能与类似的两步GEV方法进行比较,并将Kappa和GEV分布拟合到AMS中,使用代表澳大利亚气候条件的合成和真实数据。我们的研究结果表明,在广泛的母分布范围内估计极端降雨分位数时,两步Kappa方法比GEV分布表现更好(O’shea et al., 2023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling of the activated sludge process with a stratified settling unit Recent changes in the water and ecological condition at the arid Tarim River Basin A study on internal observation of vertical protective nets of temporary structures using image processing techniques Developing synthetic datasets for reef modelling Modelling hydrological impact of remotely sensed vegetation change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1