The Impact of the 5E Learning Cycle Model Based on the STEM Approach on Scientific Attitudes and Science Learning Outcomes

Ni Made Wiriani, I. M. Ardana
{"title":"The Impact of the 5E Learning Cycle Model Based on the STEM Approach on Scientific Attitudes and Science Learning Outcomes","authors":"Ni Made Wiriani, I. M. Ardana","doi":"10.23887/jjpgsd.v10i2.48515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was found that students' learning outcomes and scientific attitudes were low. This study aims to analyze Cycle 5E based on the STEM approach to scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes. This research is experimental. The population is 294 students. Methods of collecting data are test and non-test. The instruments used are questionnaire sheets or questionnaires for scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes tests. The technique of analyzing the data is descriptive analysis and inferential statistics. The results of the research are that there are differences in scientific attitudes between students who take part in learning using the 5E Learning Cycle based on the STEM approach and students who use the direct learning model, with a significant level of 0.026. There are differences in science learning outcomes between students who take lessons using Learning Cycle 5E based on the STEM approach and students who use direct learning models, with a significance level of less than 0.000. It was concluded that there were differences in scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes between students who participated in learning using Learning Cycle 5E based on the STEM approach and students who participated in direct learning. This research implies that the 5E learning cycle based on the STEM approach can improve scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":223722,"journal":{"name":"MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v10i2.48515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It was found that students' learning outcomes and scientific attitudes were low. This study aims to analyze Cycle 5E based on the STEM approach to scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes. This research is experimental. The population is 294 students. Methods of collecting data are test and non-test. The instruments used are questionnaire sheets or questionnaires for scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes tests. The technique of analyzing the data is descriptive analysis and inferential statistics. The results of the research are that there are differences in scientific attitudes between students who take part in learning using the 5E Learning Cycle based on the STEM approach and students who use the direct learning model, with a significant level of 0.026. There are differences in science learning outcomes between students who take lessons using Learning Cycle 5E based on the STEM approach and students who use direct learning models, with a significance level of less than 0.000. It was concluded that there were differences in scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes between students who participated in learning using Learning Cycle 5E based on the STEM approach and students who participated in direct learning. This research implies that the 5E learning cycle based on the STEM approach can improve scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于STEM方法的5E学习周期模型对科学态度和科学学习成果的影响
结果发现学生的学习成果和科学态度较低。本研究旨在分析基于STEM方法的5E周期对科学态度和科学学习成果的影响。这项研究是实验性的。学生总数为294人。收集数据的方法有测试和非测试两种。所使用的工具是科学态度和科学学习成果测试的调查表或问卷。分析数据的技术是描述性分析和推理统计。研究结果表明,使用基于STEM方法的5E学习周期参与学习的学生与使用直接学习模式的学生在科学态度上存在差异,显著水平为0.026。使用基于STEM方法的学习周期5E课程的学生与使用直接学习模型的学生在科学学习成果上存在差异,显著性水平小于0.000。结果表明,采用基于STEM方法的学习周期5E参与学习的学生与直接参与学习的学生在科学态度和科学学习成果方面存在差异。本研究表明,基于STEM方法的5E学习周期可以改善科学态度和科学学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PHET Interactive Simulation Media Improves Students' Understanding of Mathematical Concepts in Integer Material Issues and Problems of Implementing Inclusive Education Policies in Elementary Schools The PJBL Model on Increasing the Pancasila Student Profile (P3) of Grade IV Elementary School Students Problem-Based Learning-Oriented Learning Video Media Uses the Filmora Application for Science Content Interactive E-Module Based on Scientific Approach in Science Content Learning for Sixth-Grade Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1