Relative Effectiveness of Various Development Finance Flows: A Comparative Study

K. Lee, Min-Kyung Hong
{"title":"Relative Effectiveness of Various Development Finance Flows: A Comparative Study","authors":"K. Lee, Min-Kyung Hong","doi":"10.23895/kdijep.2018.40.3.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to identify the most effective mode of development finance flows for the economic growth of middle-income developing and least developed countries, separately. It also attempts to confirm whether governance has any significant role in the causal relationship between development finance flows and economic growth. Policymakers in each developing country should select the most effective modality of development finance inflows among the different modalities (such as Official Development Assistance (ODA) grants, Official Development Assistance (ODA) loans, FDI, and international personal remittances) and expand it for their economic growth. Dynamic panel regression models were used on 48 least developed countries and 89 middle-income developing countries, respectively, during the Millennium Development Era: 2000-2015. The empirical analysis results show that ODA grants and remittances were most effective in promoting economic growth for least developed countries, while FDI was most effective for middle-income developing countries. These findings were not affected by the status of governance of the individual country.","PeriodicalId":127865,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: Budget","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: Budget","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2018.40.3.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the most effective mode of development finance flows for the economic growth of middle-income developing and least developed countries, separately. It also attempts to confirm whether governance has any significant role in the causal relationship between development finance flows and economic growth. Policymakers in each developing country should select the most effective modality of development finance inflows among the different modalities (such as Official Development Assistance (ODA) grants, Official Development Assistance (ODA) loans, FDI, and international personal remittances) and expand it for their economic growth. Dynamic panel regression models were used on 48 least developed countries and 89 middle-income developing countries, respectively, during the Millennium Development Era: 2000-2015. The empirical analysis results show that ODA grants and remittances were most effective in promoting economic growth for least developed countries, while FDI was most effective for middle-income developing countries. These findings were not affected by the status of governance of the individual country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种开发性资金流动的相对有效性比较研究
本文旨在分别确定中等收入发展中国家和最不发达国家经济增长的最有效的发展资金流动模式。它还试图确认治理是否在发展资金流动和经济增长之间的因果关系中发挥重要作用。每个发展中国家的政策制定者应该在不同的发展资金流入方式(如官方发展援助赠款、官方发展援助贷款、外国直接投资和国际个人汇款)中选择最有效的发展资金流入方式,并扩大其规模以促进其经济增长。在千年发展时期:2000-2015年,分别对48个最不发达国家和89个中等收入发展中国家使用了动态面板回归模型。实证分析结果表明,官方发展援助赠款和汇款对最不发达国家的经济增长最有效,而外国直接投资对中等收入发展中国家的经济增长最有效。这些调查结果不受个别国家治理状况的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presidents in Deficit: Are there Historical Rewards to Deficits? A Comparative Assessment for 2022 State Budget in Azerbaijan Selective Default Expectations Is Metallica Fractal? A Case Study European Safe Assets: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1