The Great Polarization: Understanding to the Historical Shift Away from Social Action within Evangelicalism

Benjamin Elliott
{"title":"The Great Polarization: Understanding to the Historical Shift Away from Social Action within Evangelicalism","authors":"Benjamin Elliott","doi":"10.25278/jj.v19i2.607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to discuss the enduring shift of the evangelical church, and in particular the Christian and Missionary Alliance Church as a case study, away from active social action in the late nineteenth century and towards more hesitant involvement through the twentieth century and up to the present. Following Timothy Moberg, this paper recognizes a significant reversal of emphasis in evangelicalism during this season, but argues that the root of this shift was not simply a change in focus but actual a great polarization of the ground of thought within the church. The paper involves a brief survey of some of the involved historical dynamics at play from Schleiermacher to Rauschenbusch, but then concludes through a constructive comparison with the polarization of thought during the era of the Arian controversy to explore the possibility of hopeful pathways forward for the evangelical church in its dual mission to both preach God’s good news in Christ and to serve and care for the poor and vulnerable.","PeriodicalId":186227,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Jaffray","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Jaffray","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v19i2.607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to discuss the enduring shift of the evangelical church, and in particular the Christian and Missionary Alliance Church as a case study, away from active social action in the late nineteenth century and towards more hesitant involvement through the twentieth century and up to the present. Following Timothy Moberg, this paper recognizes a significant reversal of emphasis in evangelicalism during this season, but argues that the root of this shift was not simply a change in focus but actual a great polarization of the ground of thought within the church. The paper involves a brief survey of some of the involved historical dynamics at play from Schleiermacher to Rauschenbusch, but then concludes through a constructive comparison with the polarization of thought during the era of the Arian controversy to explore the possibility of hopeful pathways forward for the evangelical church in its dual mission to both preach God’s good news in Christ and to serve and care for the poor and vulnerable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大极化:对福音派社会行动历史转移的理解
本文的目的是讨论福音派教会的持久转变,特别是基督教和传教士联盟教会作为一个案例研究,从19世纪后期的积极社会行动到20世纪至今的更犹豫的参与。跟随Timothy Moberg,本文认识到福音派在这个季节的重点发生了重大逆转,但认为这种转变的根源不仅仅是焦点的变化,而是教会内部思想基础的巨大两极分化。本文对施莱尔马赫和劳森布希之间的一些历史动态进行了简要的考察,然后通过对阿里乌斯派争论时期思想的两极分化进行建设性的比较,以探索福音派教会在宣讲上帝在基督里的好消息和服务和照顾穷人和弱势群体的双重使命中充满希望的前进道路的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Euthanasia Debate and Its Implications on The Legalization of Euthanasia in Indonesia Urban Mission Strategy Through One-on-One Online Dialogue in Melbourne Australia Favoritism of God? שָׁעָה in Genesis 4:1-16 and its implications for Cain’s status and offerings Covenant Violation as A Pathway For Interpreting The Gospel: An Engagement With Schilder and The Yoruba Thought Conformed to the Image of Christ: Evaluating Approaches to Spiritual Formation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1