An Exploration of Historical Transitions with Simple Analogies and Empirical Event Rates

D. LePoire
{"title":"An Exploration of Historical Transitions with Simple Analogies and Empirical Event Rates","authors":"D. LePoire","doi":"10.22339/JBH.V3I2.3210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various qualitative models have been suggested for major historical social and technological transitions. Many of these transitions still have puzzling aspects such as the early transition from hunter-gatherer to agriculturallybased society which required dramatically increased effort. Another puzzle is the emergence of the scientific and industrial revolution in Europe despite many previous similar discoveries in other regions. Explorations of simple models with aggregate, dynamic, and nonlinear processes might lead to insights of the unique aspects of each transition. Topics include the transitions between hunter-gatherers, agricultural societies, early civilizations, market development, capitalism, industrialization, and sustainable societies with factors of land-pressures, economies of scale, suppressed growth, and chain reactions. Many types of models could be applied to these transitions. First, basic characteristics, such as width and midpoint of the transitions, are determined by analyzing historical events contributing to the transition. However, this does give much insight into the dynamics or parameters of the transition. For more understanding, each of six transitions is explored with a simple phenomenological model. These simplified models do not attempt to quantitatively address the details of the actual historical mechanisms Instead analogies to more natural systems are invoked to gain insights. Correspondence | David J. LePoire, dlepoire@anl.gov Citation | LePoire, D. (2019) An Exploration of Historical Transitions with Simple Analogies and Empirical Event Rates. Journal of Big History, III(2);1 16. DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.22339/jbh.v3i2.3210","PeriodicalId":326067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Big History","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Big History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22339/JBH.V3I2.3210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Various qualitative models have been suggested for major historical social and technological transitions. Many of these transitions still have puzzling aspects such as the early transition from hunter-gatherer to agriculturallybased society which required dramatically increased effort. Another puzzle is the emergence of the scientific and industrial revolution in Europe despite many previous similar discoveries in other regions. Explorations of simple models with aggregate, dynamic, and nonlinear processes might lead to insights of the unique aspects of each transition. Topics include the transitions between hunter-gatherers, agricultural societies, early civilizations, market development, capitalism, industrialization, and sustainable societies with factors of land-pressures, economies of scale, suppressed growth, and chain reactions. Many types of models could be applied to these transitions. First, basic characteristics, such as width and midpoint of the transitions, are determined by analyzing historical events contributing to the transition. However, this does give much insight into the dynamics or parameters of the transition. For more understanding, each of six transitions is explored with a simple phenomenological model. These simplified models do not attempt to quantitatively address the details of the actual historical mechanisms Instead analogies to more natural systems are invoked to gain insights. Correspondence | David J. LePoire, dlepoire@anl.gov Citation | LePoire, D. (2019) An Exploration of Historical Transitions with Simple Analogies and Empirical Event Rates. Journal of Big History, III(2);1 16. DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.22339/jbh.v3i2.3210
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用简单类比和经验事件率探索历史变迁
对于重大的历史、社会和技术转变,人们提出了各种定性模型。其中许多转变仍然有令人困惑的方面,例如早期从狩猎采集社会向以农业为基础的社会的转变,这需要极大地增加努力。另一个令人困惑的问题是,尽管在其他地区有许多类似的发现,但科学和工业革命还是在欧洲出现了。对具有聚合、动态和非线性过程的简单模型的探索可能会导致对每个转换的独特方面的见解。主题包括狩猎采集社会、农业社会、早期文明、市场发展、资本主义、工业化和可持续社会之间的过渡,其中包括土地压力、规模经济、抑制增长和连锁反应等因素。许多类型的模型可以应用于这些转换。首先,通过分析促成转型的历史事件,确定转型的宽度和中点等基本特征。然而,这确实提供了对转换的动态或参数的深入了解。为了更好地理解,我们用一个简单的现象学模型来探讨六种转变中的每一种。这些简化的模型并不试图定量地解决实际历史机制的细节,而是调用与更自然系统的类比来获得洞察力。通信| David J. LePoire, dlepoire@anl.gov引文| LePoire, D.(2019)用简单类比和经验事件率探索历史变迁。大历史学报,33(2);16。DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.22339/jbh.v3i2.3210
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution = Exchange Explanation of Time Dilation of High Redshift Quasars, Surface Brightness, and Cosmic Microwave Background with the Stress Cosmology The General Law of Being, Article 3: The Ultimate Cause of Evolution Two Theoretical Perspectives to Explain Big History: Fred Spier & Pedro Ortiz Cabanillas Structural Change in Big Economic History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1