Domain over size: Clinical ELECTRA surpasses general BERT for bleeding site classification in the free text of electronic health records

J. Pedersen, M. Laursen, C. Soguero-Ruíz, T. Savarimuthu, R. Hansen, P. Vinholt
{"title":"Domain over size: Clinical ELECTRA surpasses general BERT for bleeding site classification in the free text of electronic health records","authors":"J. Pedersen, M. Laursen, C. Soguero-Ruíz, T. Savarimuthu, R. Hansen, P. Vinholt","doi":"10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bleeding can be a life-threatening condition which occurs for 3.2% of medical patients. Information about previous bleeding and bleeding site is used to predict the risk of future bleeding and guide anticoagulant treatment. However, obtaining this information is a time-consuming task as it is contained in the free text of electronic health records. Previous research has mainly been focused on extracting bleeding events but does not classify the bleeding site which is important for assessing the severity of the bleeding. This study creates the first dataset for developing and evaluating machine learning models for classification of bleeding site. The dataset consists of sentences annotated by medical doctors as belonging to one of ten bleeding sites. The sentences were annotated in 149,523 electronic health record notes from 1,533 patients of Odense University Hospital, Denmark, between 2015 and 2020. We compare different deep learning models on classifying bleeding site and find that a ∼13M parameter ELECTRA model pretrained on clinical text achieves higher accuracy ($0.905\\ \\pm 0.002$) than a ∼110M parameter general BERT model ($0.884 \\pm 0.001$) on a balanced test set of 1,500 sentences. We furthermore test different methods for dealing with unbalanced data without finding any significant differences between methods.","PeriodicalId":347210,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Bleeding can be a life-threatening condition which occurs for 3.2% of medical patients. Information about previous bleeding and bleeding site is used to predict the risk of future bleeding and guide anticoagulant treatment. However, obtaining this information is a time-consuming task as it is contained in the free text of electronic health records. Previous research has mainly been focused on extracting bleeding events but does not classify the bleeding site which is important for assessing the severity of the bleeding. This study creates the first dataset for developing and evaluating machine learning models for classification of bleeding site. The dataset consists of sentences annotated by medical doctors as belonging to one of ten bleeding sites. The sentences were annotated in 149,523 electronic health record notes from 1,533 patients of Odense University Hospital, Denmark, between 2015 and 2020. We compare different deep learning models on classifying bleeding site and find that a ∼13M parameter ELECTRA model pretrained on clinical text achieves higher accuracy ($0.905\ \pm 0.002$) than a ∼110M parameter general BERT model ($0.884 \pm 0.001$) on a balanced test set of 1,500 sentences. We furthermore test different methods for dealing with unbalanced data without finding any significant differences between methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领域超过大小:在电子健康记录的自由文本中,临床ELECTRA在出血部位分类方面优于一般BERT
出血可能是危及生命的情况,3.2%的医疗患者会发生出血。既往出血和出血部位的信息用于预测未来出血的风险并指导抗凝治疗。然而,获得这些信息是一项耗时的任务,因为它包含在电子健康记录的免费文本中。以往的研究主要集中在提取出血事件,但没有对出血部位进行分类,这对评估出血的严重程度很重要。本研究为开发和评估出血部位分类的机器学习模型创建了第一个数据集。该数据集由医生注释的句子组成,这些句子属于十个出血部位之一。这些句子被标注在2015年至2020年间,来自丹麦欧登塞大学医院1533名患者的149523份电子健康记录笔记中。我们比较了不同的深度学习模型对出血部位进行分类,发现在临床文本上预训练的~ 13M参数ELECTRA模型在1500个句子的平衡测试集上达到了更高的准确率($0.905\ \pm 0.002$),而在~ 110M参数的一般BERT模型($0.884 \pm 0.001$)。我们进一步测试了处理不平衡数据的不同方法,没有发现方法之间有任何显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BEBOP: Bidirectional dEep Brain cOnnectivity maPping Stabilizing Skeletal Pose Estimation using mmWave Radar via Dynamic Model and Filtering Behavioral Data Categorization for Transformers-based Models in Digital Health Gender Difference in Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Influence of Sensor Position and Body Movements on Radar-Based Heart Rate Monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1