Return of Confiscated Property to Victims of Crime of Fraud in Indonesia's Legal System

W. Widiastuti, A. Hamzani, F. Sudewo, Kus Rizkianto
{"title":"Return of Confiscated Property to Victims of Crime of Fraud in Indonesia's Legal System","authors":"W. Widiastuti, A. Hamzani, F. Sudewo, Kus Rizkianto","doi":"10.4108/eai.28-5-2022.2320571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Property confiscated in cases of fraud can be returned. The return mechanism has been regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Laundering. Victims who get their property back according to the value of the loss is a form of recovery to the victim. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal rules related to confiscated property in the Indonesian legal system and analyze the mechanism for returning confiscated property to victims of fraud in the Indonesian legal system. The results of the study show that the confiscation of objects is part of an additional crime for criminal actors including the confiscation of certain goods, this is very clearly regulated in Article 10 of the Criminal Code. The purpose of confiscation is for evidentiary purposes, especially as evidence before a court hearing. Article 39 of the Criminal Procedure Code itself has outlined the \"legal principle\" in the confiscation of objects which limits the objects that can be subject to confiscation. The asset recovery mechanism for victims of predicate crimes who are not state actors cannot be carried out through the asset confiscation mechanism. In the Money Laundering Law, one of the mechanisms for returning assets to victims of criminal acts of fraud can be implemented through a judge's decision which states that these assets are returned to those named in the decision.","PeriodicalId":198499,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, MALAPY 2022, 28 May 2022, Tegal, Indonesia","volume":"238 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, MALAPY 2022, 28 May 2022, Tegal, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-5-2022.2320571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Property confiscated in cases of fraud can be returned. The return mechanism has been regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Laundering. Victims who get their property back according to the value of the loss is a form of recovery to the victim. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal rules related to confiscated property in the Indonesian legal system and analyze the mechanism for returning confiscated property to victims of fraud in the Indonesian legal system. The results of the study show that the confiscation of objects is part of an additional crime for criminal actors including the confiscation of certain goods, this is very clearly regulated in Article 10 of the Criminal Code. The purpose of confiscation is for evidentiary purposes, especially as evidence before a court hearing. Article 39 of the Criminal Procedure Code itself has outlined the "legal principle" in the confiscation of objects which limits the objects that can be subject to confiscation. The asset recovery mechanism for victims of predicate crimes who are not state actors cannot be carried out through the asset confiscation mechanism. In the Money Laundering Law, one of the mechanisms for returning assets to victims of criminal acts of fraud can be implemented through a judge's decision which states that these assets are returned to those named in the decision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼法律制度下诈骗犯罪受害人的财产返还
. 在欺诈案件中被没收的财产可以返还。2010年《印度尼西亚共和国关于预防和根除洗钱罪的第8号法》对返还机制进行了规定。受害人根据损失的价值取回财产是对受害人的一种补偿。本研究的目的是分析印尼法律体系中与没收财产相关的法律规则,并分析印尼法律体系中返还被没收财产给欺诈受害者的机制。研究结果表明,没收物品是犯罪行为者包括没收某些物品在内的一项附加罪行的一部分,这在《刑法》第10条中有非常明确的规定。没收的目的是为了提供证据,特别是作为法庭听证前的证据。《刑事诉讼法》第39条本身概述了没收物品的“法律原则”,其中限制了可被没收的物品。对非国家行为人的上游犯罪被害人的资产追偿机制不能通过资产没收机制来实现。在《反洗钱法》中,将资产返还给欺诈犯罪行为受害者的机制之一可以通过法官的判决来实施,该判决规定将这些资产返还给判决中指定的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Professional Competence and Pedagogic Competence of Teachers on Numeracy Literacy Government Responsibility for Lost of People's Life In Prison Fire Class I Tangerang The Policy of The City of Tegal Government in The Implementation of The Development of The City Walk of Malioboro Viewing from The Aspect of Dignity Justice Marketing Strategy, Quality of Education Services and Education Facilities as The Basis of Efforts to Increase Community Interest in Choosing MTSN 2 Pekalongan Through The Marketing Mix Legal Protection Against Business Small Medium Micro Affected By The Covid-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1