Has increasing the age for child passengers to wear child restraints improved the extent to which they are used? Results from an Australian focus group and survey study

Alexia Janet Lennon
{"title":"Has increasing the age for child passengers to wear child restraints improved the extent to which they are used? Results from an Australian focus group and survey study","authors":"Alexia Janet Lennon","doi":"10.3402/vgi.v3i0.14975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acknowledgement that many children in Australia travel in restraints that do not offer them the best protection has led to recent changes in legislation such that the type of restraint for children under 7 years is now specified. This paper reports the results of two studies (observational; focus group/ survey) carried out in the state of Queensland to evaluate the effectiveness of these changes to the legislation. Observations suggested that almost all of the children estimated as aged 0–12 years were restrained (95%). Analysis of the type of restraint used for target-aged children (0–6 year olds) suggests that the proportion using an age-appropriate restraint has increased by an estimated 7% since enactment of the legislation. However, around 1 in 4 children estimated as aged under 7 years were using restraints too large for good fit. Results from the survey and focus group suggested parents were supportive of the changes in legislation. Non-Indigenous parents agreed that the changes had been necessary, were effective at getting children into the right restraints, and were easy to understand as well as making it clear what restraint to use with children. Moreover, they did not see the legislation as too complicated or too hard to comply with. Indigenous parents who participated in a focus group also regarded the legislation as improving children's safety. However, they identified the cost of restraints as an important barrier to compliance. In summary, the legislation appears to have had a positive effect on compliance levels and on raising parental awareness of the need to restrain children in child-specific restraints for longer. However, it would seem that an important minority of parents transition their children into larger restraints too early for optimal protection. Intervention efforts should aim to better inform these parents about appropriate ages for transition, especially from forward facing child seats. This could potentially be through use of other important transitions that occur at the same age, such as starting school. The small proportion of parents who do not restrain their children at all are also an important community sector to target. Finally, obtaining restraints presents a significant barrier to compliance for parents on limited incomes and interventions are needed to address this.","PeriodicalId":356239,"journal":{"name":"Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion","volume":"451 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/vgi.v3i0.14975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Acknowledgement that many children in Australia travel in restraints that do not offer them the best protection has led to recent changes in legislation such that the type of restraint for children under 7 years is now specified. This paper reports the results of two studies (observational; focus group/ survey) carried out in the state of Queensland to evaluate the effectiveness of these changes to the legislation. Observations suggested that almost all of the children estimated as aged 0–12 years were restrained (95%). Analysis of the type of restraint used for target-aged children (0–6 year olds) suggests that the proportion using an age-appropriate restraint has increased by an estimated 7% since enactment of the legislation. However, around 1 in 4 children estimated as aged under 7 years were using restraints too large for good fit. Results from the survey and focus group suggested parents were supportive of the changes in legislation. Non-Indigenous parents agreed that the changes had been necessary, were effective at getting children into the right restraints, and were easy to understand as well as making it clear what restraint to use with children. Moreover, they did not see the legislation as too complicated or too hard to comply with. Indigenous parents who participated in a focus group also regarded the legislation as improving children's safety. However, they identified the cost of restraints as an important barrier to compliance. In summary, the legislation appears to have had a positive effect on compliance levels and on raising parental awareness of the need to restrain children in child-specific restraints for longer. However, it would seem that an important minority of parents transition their children into larger restraints too early for optimal protection. Intervention efforts should aim to better inform these parents about appropriate ages for transition, especially from forward facing child seats. This could potentially be through use of other important transitions that occur at the same age, such as starting school. The small proportion of parents who do not restrain their children at all are also an important community sector to target. Finally, obtaining restraints presents a significant barrier to compliance for parents on limited incomes and interventions are needed to address this.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高儿童乘客佩戴儿童约束装置的年龄是否改善了儿童约束装置的使用程度?来自澳大利亚焦点小组和调查研究的结果
由于认识到澳大利亚的许多儿童在旅行时使用的约束装置不能为他们提供最好的保护,因此最近对立法进行了修改,现在规定了7岁以下儿童使用的约束装置类型。本文报告了两项研究的结果(观察性;焦点小组/调查)在昆士兰州进行,以评估这些立法变化的有效性。观察结果显示,几乎所有年龄在0-12岁的儿童(95%)都受到了约束。对目标年龄儿童(0-6岁)使用的约束类型的分析表明,自立法颁布以来,使用适龄约束的比例估计增加了7%。然而,据估计,七岁以下儿童中约有四分之一的儿童使用的约束装置太大而不合适。调查和焦点小组的结果显示,家长们支持立法改革。非土著父母同意,这些改变是必要的,能有效地使儿童受到正确的约束,而且易于理解,并明确对儿童使用何种约束。此外,他们并不认为这项立法过于复杂或难以遵守。参加焦点小组的土著父母也认为这项立法改善了儿童的安全。但是,他们认为限制的费用是遵守规定的一个重要障碍。总而言之,这项立法似乎对遵守程度和提高家长对需要更长时间地用儿童专用约束装置约束儿童的认识产生了积极影响。然而,似乎有一小部分父母过早地给孩子施加更大的约束,以获得最佳的保护。干预措施的目的应该是更好地告知这些父母适当的过渡年龄,特别是从面向前方的儿童座椅。这可能是通过使用在同一年龄发生的其他重要转变,例如开始上学。一小部分根本不约束孩子的父母也是一个重要的社区群体。最后,获得限制对收入有限的父母来说是一个很大的障碍,需要采取干预措施来解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Daily newspaper reporting on elderly care in Sweden and Finland: a quantitative content analysis of ethnicity- and migration-related issues Informal and formal reconciliation strategies of older peoples' working carers: the European carers@work project Housing support workers as equilibrists between instrumentality and situation Gender as headline and subtext: problematizing the gender perspective in an occupational health project Capability to care and work: when dual roles intersect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1