Handling and Countermeasures of Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Reviewed from The Aspect of Law

S. Suroso
{"title":"Handling and Countermeasures of Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Reviewed from The Aspect of Law","authors":"S. Suroso","doi":"10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This examination concentrates on government legitimate legislative issues in managing crown episode explored from the right to wellbeing. The success right is a right of assurance to human, including from the gamble of COVID-19. The Government has given a couple of legitimate things in managing the Covid-19 pandemic, for instance, PERPPU Number1 of 2020. Indonesia Government also executed PSBB and Physical Distancing approaches. Notwithstanding, these policies were not effective in breaking the spread of COVID-19 as COVID-19 cases in Indonesia. Since January 28, 2021, it has showed up at 1 million cases which is the most major in Southeast Asia. This sort of investigation is a regularizing lawful assessment that gives deals with any consequences regarding handle COVID-19 in Indonesia. This evaluation determines that the real arrangement picked by the Indonesian Government cannot safeguard the flourishing's right of Indonesian as taught by the article 28H fragment (1) and Article 34 area (2) and (3) UUD 1945. The Government should have executed a deficient lockdown method as China's outcome in doing it in Wuhan. With a fragmentary lockdown in Jakarta Province as the mark of combination of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, the pollution won't spread to different areas.","PeriodicalId":329533,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This examination concentrates on government legitimate legislative issues in managing crown episode explored from the right to wellbeing. The success right is a right of assurance to human, including from the gamble of COVID-19. The Government has given a couple of legitimate things in managing the Covid-19 pandemic, for instance, PERPPU Number1 of 2020. Indonesia Government also executed PSBB and Physical Distancing approaches. Notwithstanding, these policies were not effective in breaking the spread of COVID-19 as COVID-19 cases in Indonesia. Since January 28, 2021, it has showed up at 1 million cases which is the most major in Southeast Asia. This sort of investigation is a regularizing lawful assessment that gives deals with any consequences regarding handle COVID-19 in Indonesia. This evaluation determines that the real arrangement picked by the Indonesian Government cannot safeguard the flourishing's right of Indonesian as taught by the article 28H fragment (1) and Article 34 area (2) and (3) UUD 1945. The Government should have executed a deficient lockdown method as China's outcome in doing it in Wuhan. With a fragmentary lockdown in Jakarta Province as the mark of combination of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, the pollution won't spread to different areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从法律角度看印尼应对新冠肺炎疫情的对策
. 本研究集中在政府的合法立法问题,在管理皇冠插曲探索从权利到福祉。成功权是人类的一种保障权,包括对新冠肺炎的赌博。政府在管理Covid-19大流行方面给出了一些合法的东西,例如,2020年第1号PERPPU。印度尼西亚政府还执行了公共卫生服务和保持身体距离的办法。尽管如此,这些政策未能有效遏制新冠病毒在印度尼西亚的传播。自2021年1月28日以来,已出现100万例病例,是东南亚最严重的病例。这种调查是一种正规化的合法评估,可以处理在印度尼西亚处理新冠肺炎的任何后果。这一评价决定了印度尼西亚政府选择的真正安排不能保障印度尼西亚人的繁荣权利,这是1945年《联合国海洋法公约》第28条h段第(1)款和第34条第(2)款和第(3)款所教导的。政府在武汉采取的封锁措施应该是中国的结果。由于印度尼西亚新冠肺炎大流行,雅加达省采取了局部封锁措施,污染不会扩散到不同地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Application of The Contradictoire Delimitatie Principle of Land Registration Provides Legal Assurance of Land Rights Fulfillment Of Patient Rights in The Implementation of Telemedicine in The Era of Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia The Contribution of The Realization of Exports of Crude Palm Oil to Farmers’ Income and Employment in Jambi Province Intellectual Property Rights on Traditional Knowledge The Effectiveness of Police Patrols Against Street Crimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1