Audit Adjustments and Public Sector Audit Quality

M. Greenwood, Ruijia Zhan
{"title":"Audit Adjustments and Public Sector Audit Quality","authors":"M. Greenwood, Ruijia Zhan","doi":"10.1111/abac.12165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of austerity-inspired reforms to public audit in England we investigate the extent to which audit firms mitigate management bias in public sector financial reports. A substantial body of literature finds that both public and not-for-profit managers manage ?earnings? to report small surpluses close to zero by managing deficits upwards and surpluses downwards. Under agency theory, auditors acting in the interests of their principal(s) would tend to reverse this bias. We exploit privileged access to pre-audit financial statements in the setting of the English National Health Service (NHS) to investigate the impact of audit adjustments on the pre-audit financial statements of English NHS Foundation Trusts over the period 2010?2011 to 2014?2015. We find evidence that auditors act to reverse management bias in the case of Trusts with a pre-audit deficit, but find no evidence that this is the case for Trusts with a pre-audit surplus. In the case of Trusts in surplus, these findings are consistent with auditors? interests being aligned with management, rather than principals.","PeriodicalId":123337,"journal":{"name":"History of Accounting eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In the context of austerity-inspired reforms to public audit in England we investigate the extent to which audit firms mitigate management bias in public sector financial reports. A substantial body of literature finds that both public and not-for-profit managers manage ?earnings? to report small surpluses close to zero by managing deficits upwards and surpluses downwards. Under agency theory, auditors acting in the interests of their principal(s) would tend to reverse this bias. We exploit privileged access to pre-audit financial statements in the setting of the English National Health Service (NHS) to investigate the impact of audit adjustments on the pre-audit financial statements of English NHS Foundation Trusts over the period 2010?2011 to 2014?2015. We find evidence that auditors act to reverse management bias in the case of Trusts with a pre-audit deficit, but find no evidence that this is the case for Trusts with a pre-audit surplus. In the case of Trusts in surplus, these findings are consistent with auditors? interests being aligned with management, rather than principals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计调整与公共部门审计质量
在紧缩的背景下,在英国公共审计启发改革,我们调查审计公司减轻管理偏见在公共部门财务报告的程度。大量文献发现,公共和非营利管理者都在管理收益。通过向上管理赤字和向下管理盈余,报告接近于零的小额盈余。在代理理论下,审计师为其委托人的利益行事会倾向于扭转这种偏见。我们利用查阅英国国民健康服务(NHS)审计前财务报表的特权,调查2010年期间审计调整对英国国民健康服务基金会信托基金审计前财务报表的影响。2011年到2014年?2015年。我们发现有证据表明,审计人员在审计前出现赤字的信托公司的情况下采取了扭转管理偏见的行动,但没有证据表明审计前出现盈余的信托公司也是如此。在信托盈余的情况下,这些发现与审计师的结论一致吗?利益与管理层一致,而不是与委托人一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of U.S. Regulation and the Standard-Setting Process for Financial Reporting: 1930s to the Present Learning to Disclose: Disclosure Dynamics in the 1890s Streetcar Industry Financial Reporting by Charities: Why Do Some Choose to Report Under a More Extensive Reporting Framework? What Makes Research Possible? The Management Studies Research Division at the London School of Economics How America was Tricked on Tax Policy: Secrets and Undisclosed Practices - Book Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1