Building Trust in the Democratic Process

S. Saleem
{"title":"Building Trust in the Democratic Process","authors":"S. Saleem","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvv417f6.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-Arab Spring events indicate that democratic openings can result in\n power shifts from secular authoritarian regimes to mainstream Islamists,\n contributing to a heightened secular-religious political polarization. This\n chapter considers how Tunisia’s Islamists avoided this pitfall where other\n post-Arab Spring countries failed. It argues that one key factor that helped\n Tunisia’s democratic transition was the building of a minimum level of\n trust during pre-Arab Spring interactions between non-regime secularists\n and Islamists, rooted in the common understanding that democracy in\n Tunisia was desired by all political participants. The Islamists’ willingness\n to trust in the democratic process and to engage in consensus building\n with secular political partners helped mediate the many contentious\n conflicts that arose at critical junctures of Tunisia’s democratic transition.","PeriodicalId":125775,"journal":{"name":"Pathways to Contemporary Islam","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathways to Contemporary Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvv417f6.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-Arab Spring events indicate that democratic openings can result in power shifts from secular authoritarian regimes to mainstream Islamists, contributing to a heightened secular-religious political polarization. This chapter considers how Tunisia’s Islamists avoided this pitfall where other post-Arab Spring countries failed. It argues that one key factor that helped Tunisia’s democratic transition was the building of a minimum level of trust during pre-Arab Spring interactions between non-regime secularists and Islamists, rooted in the common understanding that democracy in Tunisia was desired by all political participants. The Islamists’ willingness to trust in the democratic process and to engage in consensus building with secular political partners helped mediate the many contentious conflicts that arose at critical junctures of Tunisia’s democratic transition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在民主进程中建立信任
后阿拉伯之春事件表明,民主开放可能导致权力从世俗专制政权转移到主流伊斯兰主义者手中,从而加剧世俗宗教政治两极分化。本章探讨了突尼斯的伊斯兰主义者如何避免了其他阿拉伯之春后国家失败的陷阱。它认为,帮助突尼斯民主转型的一个关键因素是,在阿拉伯之春之前,非现政权的世俗主义者和伊斯兰主义者之间的互动中建立了最低程度的信任,这种信任植根于所有政治参与者都渴望突尼斯民主的共识。伊斯兰主义者对民主进程的信任,以及与世俗政治伙伴建立共识的意愿,帮助调解了在突尼斯民主转型的关键时刻出现的许多有争议的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
7. The Failure of Political Islam Revisited 6. Building Trust in the Democratic Process 9. Enhancing Dialogue Between Religious Traditions 1. Pathways to Modern Islam 3. A New Approach to Islamic Intellectual Tradition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1