{"title":"Mass Camp in Contemporary Hong Kong Cinema","authors":"S. Chao","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv15vwkcc.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers Hong Kong’s particular socio-historical context\n since the 1960s, which has been imperative to the diffusion of a local\n mass camp impulse characterized by a self-conscious, often parodic\n attitude toward the artifice of conventions, particularly those associated\n with art, gender behavior, and media representation. It then investigates\n the particular ways in which mass camp has at once informed and been\n informed by Hong Kong mainstream cinema from the 1970s onward. A\n crucial point made throughout lies in the intimate relationship between\n mass camp and the proliferating gender parody of contemporary Hong\n Kong cinema, culminating in films of the early 1990s (e.g. Swordsman II).\n This process, importantly, has also been coupled with the critical articulation\n of camp discourse since the mid-to-late 1970s.","PeriodicalId":397544,"journal":{"name":"Queer Representations in Chinese-language Film and the Cultural Landscape","volume":"521 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queer Representations in Chinese-language Film and the Cultural Landscape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15vwkcc.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter considers Hong Kong’s particular socio-historical context
since the 1960s, which has been imperative to the diffusion of a local
mass camp impulse characterized by a self-conscious, often parodic
attitude toward the artifice of conventions, particularly those associated
with art, gender behavior, and media representation. It then investigates
the particular ways in which mass camp has at once informed and been
informed by Hong Kong mainstream cinema from the 1970s onward. A
crucial point made throughout lies in the intimate relationship between
mass camp and the proliferating gender parody of contemporary Hong
Kong cinema, culminating in films of the early 1990s (e.g. Swordsman II).
This process, importantly, has also been coupled with the critical articulation
of camp discourse since the mid-to-late 1970s.