Equity issues in the provision of online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic in Kenya

Francis Likoye Malenya, A. Ohba
{"title":"Equity issues in the provision of online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic in Kenya","authors":"Francis Likoye Malenya, A. Ohba","doi":"10.1108/jice-12-2022-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to critically review the well-intended plan by the government through the Ministry of Education to continue providing quality learning through online learning and in an equitable and inclusive manner during school closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on a review of the available literature including assessment reports, academic studies and media reports.FindingsThe paper revealed that despite the visionary plan by the government that the development and implementation of an emergency response plan would ensure equitable and inclusive continued learning for all students, those learners who were disadvantaged, including those living in remote areas and urban informal settlements, girls and learners from low–socio-economic households, found it even harder to access lessons. In fact, the existing digital divide on the part of the learners and schools served to reproduce or even widen inequities in learning. The COVID-19 pandemic evidently made these inequities more visible or even worse. What had been conceived as and intended to be an equitable and inclusive learning exercise ended up marginalising learners in already marginalised spaces.Research limitations/implicationsWhile the researchers made an attempt to search for as many documents as possible, the documents selected for the paper are limited to those that explored the online learning during COVID-19 in Kenya. These reports were critically examined with a view to providing a clear picture of what online teaching and learning was like and how this picture embraced notions of fairness and inclusivity hence equity. Despite all these, there was the possibility of having some biases in the used reports. However, the researchers carefully read them triangulating them with others with similar information in an attempt to filter biases.Practical implicationsThe paper has demonstrated how the learning process can be influenced by the provision of the relevant teaching and learning materials, tools and infrastructure.Social implicationsThis paper has clearly demonstrated the position that learning is a social process and which is affected by the social factors such as gender roles, socio-economic status and the social environment in which it occurs.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to ongoing discussion about the potentials and challenges of online learning particularly in a country like Kenya where equity in learning still remains a considerable challenge mainly as a result of the existing socio-economic, regional and gender disparities in learning. The paper makes a contribution in terms of an authentic mode of thinking that should guide the process of provision of “learning for all”.","PeriodicalId":356133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of international cooperation in education","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of international cooperation in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jice-12-2022-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to critically review the well-intended plan by the government through the Ministry of Education to continue providing quality learning through online learning and in an equitable and inclusive manner during school closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on a review of the available literature including assessment reports, academic studies and media reports.FindingsThe paper revealed that despite the visionary plan by the government that the development and implementation of an emergency response plan would ensure equitable and inclusive continued learning for all students, those learners who were disadvantaged, including those living in remote areas and urban informal settlements, girls and learners from low–socio-economic households, found it even harder to access lessons. In fact, the existing digital divide on the part of the learners and schools served to reproduce or even widen inequities in learning. The COVID-19 pandemic evidently made these inequities more visible or even worse. What had been conceived as and intended to be an equitable and inclusive learning exercise ended up marginalising learners in already marginalised spaces.Research limitations/implicationsWhile the researchers made an attempt to search for as many documents as possible, the documents selected for the paper are limited to those that explored the online learning during COVID-19 in Kenya. These reports were critically examined with a view to providing a clear picture of what online teaching and learning was like and how this picture embraced notions of fairness and inclusivity hence equity. Despite all these, there was the possibility of having some biases in the used reports. However, the researchers carefully read them triangulating them with others with similar information in an attempt to filter biases.Practical implicationsThe paper has demonstrated how the learning process can be influenced by the provision of the relevant teaching and learning materials, tools and infrastructure.Social implicationsThis paper has clearly demonstrated the position that learning is a social process and which is affected by the social factors such as gender roles, socio-economic status and the social environment in which it occurs.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to ongoing discussion about the potentials and challenges of online learning particularly in a country like Kenya where equity in learning still remains a considerable challenge mainly as a result of the existing socio-economic, regional and gender disparities in learning. The paper makes a contribution in terms of an authentic mode of thinking that should guide the process of provision of “learning for all”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚2019冠状病毒病大流行期间提供在线学习的公平问题
本文的目的是严格审查政府通过教育部制定的良好计划,以便在因COVID-19大流行而关闭学校期间以公平和包容的方式继续通过在线学习提供优质学习。设计/方法/方法本文基于对现有文献的回顾,包括评估报告、学术研究和媒体报道。报告显示,尽管政府制定了有远见的计划,即制定和实施应急计划将确保所有学生公平和包容地继续学习,但那些处境不利的学习者,包括生活在偏远地区和城市非正规住区的学习者、女孩和来自社会经济地位较低家庭的学习者,发现更难获得课程。事实上,学习者和学校之间现有的数字鸿沟再现甚至扩大了学习中的不平等。COVID-19大流行显然使这些不平等现象更加明显,甚至更加严重。原本被设想并打算成为一种公平和包容的学习活动,结果却使已经被边缘化的空间中的学习者边缘化。研究局限性/意义虽然研究人员试图搜索尽可能多的文献,但本文选择的文献仅限于那些探讨肯尼亚COVID-19期间在线学习的文献。对这些报告进行了严格审查,以期提供一幅清晰的画面,说明在线教学和学习的情况,以及这幅画面如何包含公平和包容的概念,从而体现公平。尽管如此,所使用的报告仍有可能存在一些偏差。然而,研究人员仔细阅读了它们,并将它们与其他具有类似信息的人进行了三角分析,试图过滤偏见。实际意义本文展示了提供相关的教学材料、工具和基础设施如何影响学习过程。这篇论文清楚地表明,学习是一个社会过程,并受到社会因素的影响,如性别角色、社会经济地位和发生学习的社会环境。本文对在线学习的潜力和挑战的持续讨论做出了贡献,特别是在肯尼亚这样的国家,学习公平仍然是一个相当大的挑战,主要是由于现有的社会经济、地区和性别差异。本文在提供一种真实的思维模式方面做出了贡献,这种思维模式应该指导提供“全民学习”的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of quality assurance in higher education from INQAAHE GGP to ISGs − Are quality assurance agencies in Asia ready to the emerging modules? Higher education cooperation at the regional level Book review: Shadow Education in the Middle East: Private Supplementary Tutoring and its Policy Implications Birth and evolution of “social studies” in Myanmar: dramatic changes in contents and approaches How did local wisdom and practice make schools thrive during the pandemic? Evidence from a positive deviance study in rural Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1