Power outage related statistics in Sweden since the early 2000s and evaluation of reliability trends

C. J. Wallnerström, M. Dalheim, Mihai Seratelius, T. Johansson
{"title":"Power outage related statistics in Sweden since the early 2000s and evaluation of reliability trends","authors":"C. J. Wallnerström, M. Dalheim, Mihai Seratelius, T. Johansson","doi":"10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents statistics based on over 15 years of power outage related data in Sweden collected by the national regulatory authority (NRA). In the early 2000s, Sweden introduced its first economic incentive scheme regarding continuity of supply (CoS) for power distribution system operators (DSO). For this purpose, the NRA began to collect power outage data from each DSO on an aggregated level. A few years later, in 2005, a severe hurricane struck Sweden that highlighted the vulnerability of the Swedish power system, resulting in a new regulatory framework related to power outages. To be able to effectively monitor the CoS in Sweden, the NRA began in 2010 to collect data on power outages on a customer level. Since 2012 a new revenue cap regulation with economic CoS incentives was implemented with major revisions from 2016 and 2020 respectively.The amount of detailed data available enables the NRA to closely monitor the CoS in the Swedish power grid. As a result of the stricter rules on power outages, there have been major investments in more reliable power distribution systems over the past decade. A positive tendency can be seen even if the CoS fluctuates from year to year due to e.g. weather events. The CoS is slightly better for years with mild weather and the impact on the CoS is less negative for years with severe storms, even if it is still far from good enough. The aim of this paper is to publish statistics with some concluding remarks from the NRA. We believe that sharing our experiences from Sweden may be of value for others, e.g. when developing new laws and regulations. The paper also contributes by informing about available data related to Swedish power outages for others to use when comparing countries or developing probabilistic models.","PeriodicalId":126918,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents statistics based on over 15 years of power outage related data in Sweden collected by the national regulatory authority (NRA). In the early 2000s, Sweden introduced its first economic incentive scheme regarding continuity of supply (CoS) for power distribution system operators (DSO). For this purpose, the NRA began to collect power outage data from each DSO on an aggregated level. A few years later, in 2005, a severe hurricane struck Sweden that highlighted the vulnerability of the Swedish power system, resulting in a new regulatory framework related to power outages. To be able to effectively monitor the CoS in Sweden, the NRA began in 2010 to collect data on power outages on a customer level. Since 2012 a new revenue cap regulation with economic CoS incentives was implemented with major revisions from 2016 and 2020 respectively.The amount of detailed data available enables the NRA to closely monitor the CoS in the Swedish power grid. As a result of the stricter rules on power outages, there have been major investments in more reliable power distribution systems over the past decade. A positive tendency can be seen even if the CoS fluctuates from year to year due to e.g. weather events. The CoS is slightly better for years with mild weather and the impact on the CoS is less negative for years with severe storms, even if it is still far from good enough. The aim of this paper is to publish statistics with some concluding remarks from the NRA. We believe that sharing our experiences from Sweden may be of value for others, e.g. when developing new laws and regulations. The paper also contributes by informing about available data related to Swedish power outages for others to use when comparing countries or developing probabilistic models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典自21世纪初以来的停电相关统计数据和可靠性趋势评估
本文基于瑞典国家监管机构(NRA)收集的超过15年的停电相关数据进行统计。在21世纪初,瑞典为配电系统运营商(DSO)推出了第一个关于供应连续性(CoS)的经济激励计划。为此,NRA开始从每个DSO收集汇总级别的停电数据。几年后的2005年,一场严重的飓风袭击了瑞典,突显了瑞典电力系统的脆弱性,导致了与停电有关的新监管框架。为了能够有效地监控瑞典的co, NRA从2010年开始收集客户层面的停电数据。自2012年以来,中国实施了新的收入上限规定,并在2016年和2020年分别进行了重大修订。可获得的大量详细数据使NRA能够密切监测瑞典电网中的co。由于对停电实行了更严格的规定,在过去的十年里,对更可靠的配电系统进行了大量投资。即使由于诸如天气事件等原因,CoS年复一年地波动,也可以看到正趋势。在天气温和的年份,CoS略好一些,而在风暴严重的年份,CoS的负面影响较小,尽管还远远不够好。本文的目的是公布统计数据和全国步枪协会的一些总结意见。我们相信,分享瑞典的经验可能对其他国家有价值,例如在制定新的法律和法规时。该论文还提供了与瑞典停电有关的可用数据,供其他人在比较国家或开发概率模型时使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Operating Reserve Assessment in Systems with Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles Framework and methodology for active distribution grid planning in Norway Parallel GPU Implementation for Fast Generating System Adequacy Assessment via Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation Distribution System Planning Considering Power Quality, Loadability and Economic Aspects Modelling and Simulation of Uncertainty in the Placement of Distributed Energy Resources for Planning Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1