The Impact of Emergency Call Taking on the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Ambulance Call-Takers: A Systematic Thematic Narrative of Qualitative Research

E. Willis, S. Lawn, L. Roberts, L. Couzner, L. Mohammadi, Elizabeth Goble
{"title":"The Impact of Emergency Call Taking on the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Ambulance Call-Takers: A Systematic Thematic Narrative of Qualitative Research","authors":"E. Willis, S. Lawn, L. Roberts, L. Couzner, L. Mohammadi, Elizabeth Goble","doi":"10.33151/ajp.17.801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Over the past decade there has been significant focus on the mental health and wellbeing of emergency service workers in Australia, evidenced by the 2018 Senate Inquiry into the role of Commonwealth, state and territory Governments in addressing the high rates of mental health conditions experienced by first responders, emergency service workers and volunteers. Call-takers as an occupational group within this domain are at risk of cumulative and vicarious trauma, yet there is little research on their work-related mental illness. This systematic thematic narative literature review of qualitative articles reports on the mental health and wellbeing of emergency call-takers. Methods Both published peer review (2000–2018) and grey literature (2009–2018) that examined the impact of emergency work on call-takers was retrieved. Papers that focussed on call-takers’ psychological and psychosocial health were selected. Databases included Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Ovid EMcare, PsychInfo, Scopus as well as Google Scholar. Results Fourteen articles met the eligibility criteria; five peer review and nine grey literature studies. Thematic analysis identified issues around surveillance versus lack of supervision; role denial versus advocacy; and failure to acknowledge vicarious trauma. Suggestions for improvement required recognition of the stressful nature of the work, improvements in workplace culture and the provision of support and counselling services. Conclusion Workplace stressors for call-takers arise from their work in dealing with trauma related communication with the public as well workplace culture, particularly the response of management to issues such as shift work, poorly managed rosters and long hours of work with little time for recovery. Compounding these issues is the invisibility of call-taker work.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.17.801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background Over the past decade there has been significant focus on the mental health and wellbeing of emergency service workers in Australia, evidenced by the 2018 Senate Inquiry into the role of Commonwealth, state and territory Governments in addressing the high rates of mental health conditions experienced by first responders, emergency service workers and volunteers. Call-takers as an occupational group within this domain are at risk of cumulative and vicarious trauma, yet there is little research on their work-related mental illness. This systematic thematic narative literature review of qualitative articles reports on the mental health and wellbeing of emergency call-takers. Methods Both published peer review (2000–2018) and grey literature (2009–2018) that examined the impact of emergency work on call-takers was retrieved. Papers that focussed on call-takers’ psychological and psychosocial health were selected. Databases included Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Ovid EMcare, PsychInfo, Scopus as well as Google Scholar. Results Fourteen articles met the eligibility criteria; five peer review and nine grey literature studies. Thematic analysis identified issues around surveillance versus lack of supervision; role denial versus advocacy; and failure to acknowledge vicarious trauma. Suggestions for improvement required recognition of the stressful nature of the work, improvements in workplace culture and the provision of support and counselling services. Conclusion Workplace stressors for call-takers arise from their work in dealing with trauma related communication with the public as well workplace culture, particularly the response of management to issues such as shift work, poorly managed rosters and long hours of work with little time for recovery. Compounding these issues is the invisibility of call-taker work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急呼叫对救护车呼叫者心理健康和福祉的影响:定性研究的系统主题叙述
在过去十年中,澳大利亚一直非常关注紧急服务工作者的心理健康和福祉,2018年参议院对联邦、州和领土政府在解决第一响应者、紧急服务工作者和志愿者经历的高心理健康状况方面的作用进行了调查,证明了这一点。作为这一领域的一个职业群体,接听电话的人面临着累积性和替代性创伤的风险,但关于他们与工作有关的精神疾病的研究却很少。这系统的专题叙述文献综述定性文章报告心理健康和福祉的紧急呼叫。方法检索已发表的同行评议(2000-2018年)和灰色文献(2009-2018年),研究应急工作对呼叫者的影响。选择了重点关注来电者心理和社会心理健康的论文。数据库包括Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Ovid EMcare, PsychInfo, Scopus以及Google Scholar。结果14篇文章符合入选标准;5个同行评议和9个灰色文献研究。专题分析确定了有关监督与缺乏监督的问题;角色否认与倡导;以及不承认替代性创伤。改进建议要求承认工作的压力性质,改善工作场所文化,并提供支持和咨询服务。结论电话接线员的工作压力源来自于他们处理与公众有关的创伤沟通的工作以及工作场所文化,特别是管理人员对轮班工作,管理不善和长时间工作几乎没有恢复时间等问题的反应。使这些问题更加复杂的是电话接线员工作的不可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of An Electronic Referral Proforma from Paramedics to General Practitioners: A Delphi Study Comparison of Two Pre-Hospital Stroke Scales to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes in Australia: A Prospective Observational Study A New Era of Opportunity – Securing Excellence for Our Journal Experience of Paramedics Providing Care to People Living with Dementia: The Working with Uncertainty Pre-Hospital Early Warning Scores are Associated with Requirement for Medical Retrieval Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1