Proposal for a Simple Mechanism to Encourage Capital Investment in Electricity Generation Capacity: Illusion or Reality?

C. Chaton, F. Hermon, Virginie Pignon
{"title":"Proposal for a Simple Mechanism to Encourage Capital Investment in Electricity Generation Capacity: Illusion or Reality?","authors":"C. Chaton, F. Hermon, Virginie Pignon","doi":"10.1111/j.1753-0237.2011.00197.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Market prices make it possible to realise returns on capital investments in the electricity sector, but these prices may not necessarily be politically or socially acceptable. As a result, explicit or implicit price caps may be established. If these caps are effective, they may result in loss of income and therefore discourage investors. To remedy this problem, several mechanisms have been proposed and put into place. The goal of this paper is not to perform an analysis of these initiator mechanisms for capital investment but, rather, to study an alternative. We show that this conceptually simple mechanism, which appears to correspond to the desires of producers and suppliers, is actually an illusion. Admittedly, the mechanism allows a single producer (or multiple producers with the same production mix) to recover its (their) costs despite the price cap. However, it does not allow certain technologies to be profitable. As a result, producers may be reluctant to invest in these technologies. This reluctance is more significant with the introduction of risk. The mechanism creates a distortion, moving money from peak to base technologies. Furthermore, it is not simple to implement.","PeriodicalId":103205,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: OPEC Energy Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: OPEC Energy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-0237.2011.00197.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Market prices make it possible to realise returns on capital investments in the electricity sector, but these prices may not necessarily be politically or socially acceptable. As a result, explicit or implicit price caps may be established. If these caps are effective, they may result in loss of income and therefore discourage investors. To remedy this problem, several mechanisms have been proposed and put into place. The goal of this paper is not to perform an analysis of these initiator mechanisms for capital investment but, rather, to study an alternative. We show that this conceptually simple mechanism, which appears to correspond to the desires of producers and suppliers, is actually an illusion. Admittedly, the mechanism allows a single producer (or multiple producers with the same production mix) to recover its (their) costs despite the price cap. However, it does not allow certain technologies to be profitable. As a result, producers may be reluctant to invest in these technologies. This reluctance is more significant with the introduction of risk. The mechanism creates a distortion, moving money from peak to base technologies. Furthermore, it is not simple to implement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓励资本投资发电能力的简单机制建议:幻想还是现实?
市场价格使电力部门的资本投资实现回报成为可能,但这些价格可能不一定在政治上或社会上可以接受。因此,可能会建立显性或隐性的价格上限。如果这些限制是有效的,它们可能会导致收入损失,从而打击投资者。为了解决这个问题,已经提出并实施了若干机制。本文的目的不是对这些资本投资的启动机制进行分析,而是研究一种替代方案。我们表明,这个概念上简单的机制,似乎符合生产者和供应商的愿望,实际上是一种错觉。诚然,该机制允许单个生产商(或具有相同生产组合的多个生产商)在价格上限的情况下收回成本。然而,它不允许某些技术盈利。因此,生产商可能不愿投资这些技术。随着风险的引入,这种不情愿更加明显。这种机制造成了一种扭曲,将资金从峰值技术转移到基础技术。此外,实现起来并不简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors that Drive Energy Use in Africa: Panel Data Evidence from Selected Sub‐Sahara African Countries The Policy Implications of the Relationship between Energy Consumption, Energy Intensity and Economic Growth in Ghana Time Series Analysis of Volatility in the Petroleum Pricing Markets: The Persistence, Asymmetry and Jumps in the Returns Series Analysing the Efficiency of Renewable Energy Consumption Among Oil‐Producing African Countries US Private Oil and Natural Gas Royalties: Estimates and Policy Relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1