A Multiple Group Analysis of Absolute versus Accessible Personal Luxury Goods Consumption Behavior among Generations X and Y in the US

Jihyun Kim, S. Rogers
{"title":"A Multiple Group Analysis of Absolute versus Accessible Personal Luxury Goods Consumption Behavior among Generations X and Y in the US","authors":"Jihyun Kim, S. Rogers","doi":"10.18178/IJTEF.2020.11.6.680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global luxury market reached €1.17 trillion in sales in 2018 and the global market for personal luxury goods is forecast to grow to €290 billion by 2020. Close to 70% of the global personal luxury goods sales are tribute by Generations X and Y. When considering the fact that Generation X is the smaller consumer segment based on a population size, compared to baby boomers or generation Y, Gen X segment’s total expenditure on personal luxury goods, which was greater than that of either of generational cohorts is highly noteworthy. A recent study by Kim (2019) found that both generations X and Y are much heavily involved in luxury goods consumption through the ownership of multiple product categories including clothing, shoes, handbags and small leather goods, and jewelry, compared to older and younger baby boomers. Regarding personal luxury consumption at different price points such as absolute luxury vs. accessible luxury has not received much attention. Thus, this study aims to provide insights by investigating US affluent Generations X and Y consumers’ perception and lifestyle variables and their predictability of behavioral variables in the personal luxury marketplace. Using a nationwide representative sampling and online survey, a final sample of 299 responses were collected and used for this study. The confirmatory factor analysis of the measurement more as well as proposed conceptual model revealed that data fit the proposed conceptual model well. All, except one, research hypotheses received statistical support. A structural equation modeling using multiple group analysis revealed that absolute luxury owners are significantly different from accessible luxury owners. Based on the findings, pragmatic implications and future research directions are provided.","PeriodicalId":243294,"journal":{"name":"International journal trade, economics and finance","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal trade, economics and finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/IJTEF.2020.11.6.680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The global luxury market reached €1.17 trillion in sales in 2018 and the global market for personal luxury goods is forecast to grow to €290 billion by 2020. Close to 70% of the global personal luxury goods sales are tribute by Generations X and Y. When considering the fact that Generation X is the smaller consumer segment based on a population size, compared to baby boomers or generation Y, Gen X segment’s total expenditure on personal luxury goods, which was greater than that of either of generational cohorts is highly noteworthy. A recent study by Kim (2019) found that both generations X and Y are much heavily involved in luxury goods consumption through the ownership of multiple product categories including clothing, shoes, handbags and small leather goods, and jewelry, compared to older and younger baby boomers. Regarding personal luxury consumption at different price points such as absolute luxury vs. accessible luxury has not received much attention. Thus, this study aims to provide insights by investigating US affluent Generations X and Y consumers’ perception and lifestyle variables and their predictability of behavioral variables in the personal luxury marketplace. Using a nationwide representative sampling and online survey, a final sample of 299 responses were collected and used for this study. The confirmatory factor analysis of the measurement more as well as proposed conceptual model revealed that data fit the proposed conceptual model well. All, except one, research hypotheses received statistical support. A structural equation modeling using multiple group analysis revealed that absolute luxury owners are significantly different from accessible luxury owners. Based on the findings, pragmatic implications and future research directions are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国X世代和Y世代绝对与可及个人奢侈品消费行为的多群体分析
2018年,全球奢侈品市场销售额达到1.17万亿欧元,预计到2020年,全球个人奢侈品市场将增长到2900亿欧元。全球近70%的个人奢侈品销售来自X世代和Y世代。考虑到X世代是人口规模较小的消费群体,与婴儿潮一代或Y世代相比,X世代在个人奢侈品上的总支出高于这两个世代,这一点非常值得注意。Kim(2019)最近的一项研究发现,与年龄较大和较年轻的婴儿潮一代相比,X代和Y代都通过拥有多种产品类别(包括服装、鞋子、手袋和小皮具以及珠宝)来大量参与奢侈品消费。对于不同价位的个人奢侈品消费,如绝对奢侈品和可及奢侈品,并没有受到太多关注。因此,本研究旨在通过调查美国富裕的X世代和Y世代消费者的感知和生活方式变量,以及他们对个人奢侈品市场行为变量的可预测性,提供见解。通过全国代表性抽样和在线调查,最终收集了299份回复样本并用于本研究。对测量结果和提出的概念模型进行验证性因子分析,结果表明数据与提出的概念模型拟合良好。除了一个之外,所有的研究假设都得到了统计上的支持。采用多群体分析的结构方程模型表明,绝对奢侈品拥有者与可及性奢侈品拥有者之间存在显著差异。在此基础上,提出了语用意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Proactive Capabilities and Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities on the Competitive Advantage of Manufacturing Firms The Determinants of Hotel Room Rates in Beirut: A Hedonic Pricing Model Comparison between Sino-US Trade War and the Opium War of the Qing Dynasty Assessing the Brazilian Electric Sector’s Financial Monitoring Milestone Investigating about Consumers’ Attitudes to Green Children's Toys Products in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1