A comparative evaluation of changes in microbial flora in delayed and immediate placed implants: An in vivo study

Keerthi Hiremath, Viraj Patil, Zarir Ruttonji, Preethi Kusugal, K. Sushma, P. Astagi
{"title":"A comparative evaluation of changes in microbial flora in delayed and immediate placed implants: An in vivo study","authors":"Keerthi Hiremath, Viraj Patil, Zarir Ruttonji, Preethi Kusugal, K. Sushma, P. Astagi","doi":"10.4103/jdi.jdi_19_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dental implants provide a unique opportunity for the observation of initial bacterial colonization and also for the estimation of time needed for the establishment of complex microflora. While many factors are important in determining the long-term success or failure of dental implants, very little is known about the relative importance of the subgingival bacterial populations around implants. Aim: The aim of the study was to estimate peri-implant microbial colonization in patients with immediate and delayed implants and the differences in peri-implant microflora between immediate and delayed implants. Materials and Methods: In the current study, the organisms found in the oral cavity prior to placing the implants and during the various stages of implant treatment in both the categories were assessed. Results: In the current study, organisms such as Streptococci are consistently seen. The presence of organisms such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium, which have pathogenic potential, is of importance. Conclusion: In this study, the following conclusions were made; the mode of implant placement either immediate or delayed does not alter the peri-implant microflora. Organisms present preoperatively were consistently present during the entire phase of the treatment. This study suggests that regular microbial evaluation along with clinical and radiographic monitoring could help in recognizing the potential for peri-implantitis and in the prevention of the same for better prognosis.","PeriodicalId":212982,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Implants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdi.jdi_19_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Dental implants provide a unique opportunity for the observation of initial bacterial colonization and also for the estimation of time needed for the establishment of complex microflora. While many factors are important in determining the long-term success or failure of dental implants, very little is known about the relative importance of the subgingival bacterial populations around implants. Aim: The aim of the study was to estimate peri-implant microbial colonization in patients with immediate and delayed implants and the differences in peri-implant microflora between immediate and delayed implants. Materials and Methods: In the current study, the organisms found in the oral cavity prior to placing the implants and during the various stages of implant treatment in both the categories were assessed. Results: In the current study, organisms such as Streptococci are consistently seen. The presence of organisms such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium, which have pathogenic potential, is of importance. Conclusion: In this study, the following conclusions were made; the mode of implant placement either immediate or delayed does not alter the peri-implant microflora. Organisms present preoperatively were consistently present during the entire phase of the treatment. This study suggests that regular microbial evaluation along with clinical and radiographic monitoring could help in recognizing the potential for peri-implantitis and in the prevention of the same for better prognosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延迟和即刻植入物中微生物菌群变化的比较评价:一项体内研究
背景:牙种植体提供了一个独特的机会来观察初始细菌定植,也为建立复杂的微生物群所需的时间估计。虽然许多因素都是决定种植体长期成功或失败的重要因素,但人们对种植体周围牙龈下细菌数量的相对重要性知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是评估即刻种植和延期种植患者种植体周围的微生物定植,以及即刻种植和延期种植患者种植体周围菌群的差异。材料和方法:在目前的研究中,对两种类型的种植体在放置种植体之前和种植体治疗的各个阶段在口腔中发现的微生物进行了评估。结果:在目前的研究中,一直可以看到链球菌等生物。存在的有机体,如牙龈卟啉单胞菌和梭杆菌,具有致病的潜力,是重要的。结论:本研究得出以下结论:种植体即刻或延迟放置的方式不会改变种植体周围的菌群。在整个治疗过程中,术前存在的微生物始终存在。本研究表明,定期的微生物评估以及临床和放射学监测可以帮助识别种植体周围炎的可能性,并预防同样的疾病,以获得更好的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Piezo osteotomy with all-on-4 implants to enable a full-arch rehabilitation A comparative evaluation of bite pressure between single implant prosthesis and natural teeth: An in-vivo study Two implant-retained mandibular overdenture using locator attachment – A clinical report Systemic medications and implant success: Is there a link? Part three: The effects of antiresorptive and anti-angiogenic agents on the outcome of implant therapy Gender-based predilection for the microbial load of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans present in anterior versus posterior implant sites: A preliminary observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1