Insider Information, Arbitrage and Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Policies

M. Rindisbacher
{"title":"Insider Information, Arbitrage and Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Policies","authors":"M. Rindisbacher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.302181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article extends the standard continuous time financial market model pioneered by Samuelson (1969) and Merton (1971) to allow for insider information. The paper derives necessary and sufficient conditions for arbitrage opportunities of insiders and presents optimal portfolio strategies for investors having anticipative information. We prove that if the investment horizon of an insider ends after his initial information advantage has disappeared, an insider has arbitrage opportunities if and only if the anticipative information is so informative that it contains zero-probability events given initial public information. When it ends before or when anticipative information does not contain such events we derive expressions for optimal consumption and portfolio policies and examine the effects of anticipative information on the optimal policies of an insider. Optimal insider policies are shown not to be fully revealing. Anticipative information is of no value and therefore does not affect the optimal behavior of insiders if and only if it is independent from public information. We show that arbitrage opportunities allow to replicate arbitrary consumption streams such that the insider's budget constraint is not binding. Consequently, Merton's consumption-investment problem has no solution whenever investment horizons are longer than resolution times of signals and insider information contains events whose occurrence is not believed. If the true signal is perturbed by independent noise this problem can be avoided. But since in this case investors never learn the true anticipative information we argue that this does not capture an important feature of insider information. We also show that the valuation of contingent claims measurable with respect to public information at maturity is invariant to insider information if the latter does not allow for arbitrage opportunities. In contrast contingent claims have no value for insiders with anticipative information generated by signals with continuous distribution.","PeriodicalId":180189,"journal":{"name":"Boston University Questrom School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boston University Questrom School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article extends the standard continuous time financial market model pioneered by Samuelson (1969) and Merton (1971) to allow for insider information. The paper derives necessary and sufficient conditions for arbitrage opportunities of insiders and presents optimal portfolio strategies for investors having anticipative information. We prove that if the investment horizon of an insider ends after his initial information advantage has disappeared, an insider has arbitrage opportunities if and only if the anticipative information is so informative that it contains zero-probability events given initial public information. When it ends before or when anticipative information does not contain such events we derive expressions for optimal consumption and portfolio policies and examine the effects of anticipative information on the optimal policies of an insider. Optimal insider policies are shown not to be fully revealing. Anticipative information is of no value and therefore does not affect the optimal behavior of insiders if and only if it is independent from public information. We show that arbitrage opportunities allow to replicate arbitrary consumption streams such that the insider's budget constraint is not binding. Consequently, Merton's consumption-investment problem has no solution whenever investment horizons are longer than resolution times of signals and insider information contains events whose occurrence is not believed. If the true signal is perturbed by independent noise this problem can be avoided. But since in this case investors never learn the true anticipative information we argue that this does not capture an important feature of insider information. We also show that the valuation of contingent claims measurable with respect to public information at maturity is invariant to insider information if the latter does not allow for arbitrage opportunities. In contrast contingent claims have no value for insiders with anticipative information generated by signals with continuous distribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内幕信息、套利与最优投资组合和消费政策
本文扩展了Samuelson(1969)和Merton(1971)开创的标准连续时间金融市场模型,以允许内幕信息。本文导出了内部人套利机会存在的充分必要条件,并给出了具有预期信息的投资者的最优投资组合策略。我们证明,如果内幕人的投资期限在其初始信息优势消失后结束,内幕人有套利机会当且仅当预期信息信息量大到包含给定初始公开信息的零概率事件。当它在预期信息之前或当预期信息不包含这些事件时,我们推导出最优消费和投资组合政策的表达式,并检查预期信息对内部人最优政策的影响。研究表明,最优的内幕政策并不能完全披露信息。当且仅当预期信息独立于公开信息时,预期信息是没有价值的,因此不会影响内部人的最优行为。我们表明,套利机会允许复制任意的消费流,从而使内部人的预算约束不具有约束力。因此,当投资期限长于信号的解析时间,且内幕信息包含不相信发生的事件时,默顿的消费-投资问题就没有解。如果真信号受到独立噪声的干扰,则可以避免这个问题。但由于在这种情况下,投资者永远不会了解真正的预期信息,我们认为这并没有捕捉到内幕信息的一个重要特征。我们还表明,如果内幕信息不允许套利机会,则到期时可衡量的或有权利要求的估值对内幕信息是不变的。相比之下,或有权利要求对于由连续分布的信号产生预期信息的内部人来说没有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Say on Pay Laws and Insider Trading Scientific Prizes And Post-Award Attention: Evidence From The Nobel Prize In Economics How Do Ratings and Penalties Moderate Earnings on Crowdsourced Delivery Platforms? A Simulation Approach to Designing Digital Matching Platforms Correlation Between Rewards and Commitment: An Empirical Investigation of Independent Financial Adviser in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1