Comparing users' perception of different chatbot interaction paradigms: a case study

Francisco A. M. Valério, T. G. Guimarães, R. Prates, Heloisa Candello
{"title":"Comparing users' perception of different chatbot interaction paradigms: a case study","authors":"Francisco A. M. Valério, T. G. Guimarães, R. Prates, Heloisa Candello","doi":"10.1145/3424953.3426501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we used the results of applying the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) to popular chatbots[12, 13], which yielded eleven strategies for conveying features to users, as well as six sign classes used for designing their interaction. We conducted user studies comparing two prototype chatbots with same features and different approaches to interaction: one using Natural Language Processing, and other using the sign classes and strategies to guide the user interaction. After that, we interviewed the participants, asking about their preferred aspects of each chatbot and their opinions regarding some of these aspects, and, later, analyzed the results. These point to the effectiveness of the strategies and sign classes. Then, we discuss users' perceptions of different ways of interacting with chatbots and their communicative strategies.","PeriodicalId":102113,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"225 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3424953.3426501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this work, we used the results of applying the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) to popular chatbots[12, 13], which yielded eleven strategies for conveying features to users, as well as six sign classes used for designing their interaction. We conducted user studies comparing two prototype chatbots with same features and different approaches to interaction: one using Natural Language Processing, and other using the sign classes and strategies to guide the user interaction. After that, we interviewed the participants, asking about their preferred aspects of each chatbot and their opinions regarding some of these aspects, and, later, analyzed the results. These point to the effectiveness of the strategies and sign classes. Then, we discuss users' perceptions of different ways of interacting with chatbots and their communicative strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较用户对不同聊天机器人交互模式的感知:一个案例研究
在这项工作中,我们使用了将符号学检查方法(SIM)应用于流行聊天机器人的结果[12,13],该结果产生了11种向用户传达特征的策略,以及用于设计交互的6种符号类。我们进行了用户研究,比较了两个具有相同功能和不同交互方法的原型聊天机器人:一个使用自然语言处理,另一个使用符号类和策略来指导用户交互。之后,我们采访了参与者,询问他们对每个聊天机器人的偏好方面以及他们对其中一些方面的看法,然后分析结果。这些都表明了策略和符号类的有效性。然后,我们讨论了用户对与聊天机器人交互的不同方式的看法以及他们的交流策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UX trek: a post-interaction journey from immersive experience logs Possibilities for the digital literacy of the older people in times of social distancing App coronavírus-SUS: an evalution using the ergonomic criteria of usability Beauty tech nails: towards interaction and functionality ChartVision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1